- From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:10:22 +1000
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 01:10:27 UTC
Have we included elsewhere the requirement that the receiver MUST return the message id in any reply to this message? BTW: is the message id required in any fault returned in response to the message? I would expect it to be required where it is being used for correlation. Tony Rogers -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Mark Nottingham Sent: Tue 14-Jun-05 7:56 To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Cc: Subject: Proposal for lc75/lc88 The value of [message id] uniquely identifies the message. When present, it is the responsibility of the sender to insure that each message is uniquely identified. A receiver MAY treat all messages that contain the same [message id] as the same message. No specific algorithm for the generation of unique values of [message id] is given, however methods such as the use of an IRI that exists within a domain owned by the sender combined with a sequence satisfies the uniqueness criteria but may not be the best practice from a security perspective. -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 01:10:27 UTC