=JeffH
achristensen07
Adam Bergkvist
Adam Klein
af7
Alex Russell
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Indexed DB getAll(), openKeyCursor() and objectStoreNames (#84) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Feedback on DOMError -> DOMException in Indexed DB (#88) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Feedback on DOMError -> DOMException in Indexed DB (#88) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Storage persistence (#85) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Unblocking the HTTPS Transitions (#74) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Alexander Abashkin
Alexander Petrov
aliams
Andrea
Andrea Marchesini
Andrew Betts
Andy Earnshaw
Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [webcomponents] Closed flag proposal breaks ability to audit and automate tests of web pages (#354) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Add "must-revalidate" to RequestCache enumeration (#165) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] RequestCache "reload" type must also set no-cache headers (#201) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] RequestCache "reload" type must also set no-cache headers (#201) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Algorithm for excluded headers in CORS filtered responses is hard to parse (#202) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Algorithm for excluded headers in CORS filtered responses is hard to parse (#202) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Explain cache modes (#197) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Should user be prompted in case Request credentials is set to "omit" (#209) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Use `,` rather than ` ,` for combine operation (#207) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [xhr] Fix global variable leaks (#49) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [xhr] Fix global variable leaks (#49) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#119) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Should user be prompted in case Request credentials is set to "omit" (#209) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Should request constructor throw in case of invalid enumeration parameter (#208) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Should request constructor throw in case of invalid enumeration parameter (#208) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix typo. (#154) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix typo. (#154) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [xhr] Sort headers lexicographically in getAllResponseHeaders and combine values too (#50) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [fetch] Use `,` rather than ` ,` for combine operation (#207) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [fetch] Add a bit to Opaque Responses to distinguish redirects (#79) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make the Cache API deal with request's redirect mode not being "follow" (#737) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make the Cache API deal with request's redirect mode not being "follow" (#737) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [encoding] Introduce "output encoding" (#29) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [fetch] error types too vague for TLS certificate error (#205) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- [fetch] Explain some of the design decisions behind CORS (#206) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [fetch] Add a bit to Opaque Responses to distinguish redirects (#79) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Monday, 25 January)
- [dom] Exclude style="" by default from mutation observers (#153) (Monday, 25 January)
- [encoding] Replacement encoding should handle empty input better (#33) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [encoding] Creating test suites for each encoding. (#30) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [encoding] Creating test suites for each encoding. (#30) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [encoding] Consider making the DOM name the canonical name (#32) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Only run "adopting steps" if oldDocument !== document (#146) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Lock a few IDs into place, so a recent Bikeshed update wont' change them. (#152) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Lock a few IDs into place, so a recent Bikeshed update wont' change them. (#152) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect on preflighted CORS requests generally impossible (#204) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [url] Confused about the constructor argument types (#80) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [url] Confused about the constructor argument types (#80) (Friday, 22 January)
- [encoding] Introduce "output encoding" (#29) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [fetch] Algorithm for excluded headers in CORS filtered responses is hard to parse (#202) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [fetch] RequestCache "reload" type must also set no-cache headers (#201) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [fetch] Headers.get/getAll/has do not byte-lowercase the name (#203) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [url] Parsing an empty host (#79) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [url] Parsing an empty host (#79) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [url] Parsing an empty host (#79) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [url] Parsing an empty host (#79) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [url] Parsing an empty host (#79) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Only append Authorization if none is set (#198) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [xhr] first step of open() method does not work in workers anymore (#47) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [xhr] "For the purposes of interaction with other algo..." (#48) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [xhr] "For the purposes of interaction with other algo..." (#48) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Only append Authorization if none is set (#198) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [xhr] "relative flag" outdated terminology? (#44) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- [xhr] first step of open() method does not work in workers anymore (#47) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [xhr] Remove references to the storage mutex (#46) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [xhr] Remove references to the storage mutex (#46) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [xhr] Remove references to the storage mutex (#46) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [xhr] "Release the storage mutex. " (#45) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [encoding] Fix #22: align with GB18030-2005 (#26) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [encoding] GB 18030 2000 vs 2005 (#22) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [encoding] "gb18030 ranges" have problematic definitions (#17) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [encoding] Fix #17: gb18030 cannot encode U+E5E5 (#25) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should the active worker move to environment settings object? (#811) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should the active worker move to environment settings object? (#811) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [fetch] Fix a typo on "constructing a ReadableStream" algorithm (#199) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [fetch] Fix a typo on "constructing a ReadableStream" algorithm (#199) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [url] Add a note in the URL parser. (#78) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [url] Add a note in the URL parser. (#78) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [xhr] "Release the storage mutex. " (#45) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [fetch] Only append Authorization if none is set (#198) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- [fetch] Only append Authorization if none is set (#198) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [xhr] "relative flag" outdated terminology? (#44) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [encoding] What's the correct choice for BIG5 F9FE? (#28) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [encoding] What's the correct choice for BIG5 F9FE? (#28) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [encoding] What's the correct choice for BIG5 F9FE? (#28) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Sunday, 17 January)
- [fetch] Explain cache modes (#197) (Saturday, 16 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Question — Why can I not read the stream again ? (#196) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Question — Why can I not read the stream again ? (#196) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Question — Why can I not read the stream again ? (#196) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [xhr] Ajax call to server in synchronous mode <> disrupt user experience! (#43) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [xhr] Ajax call to server in synchronous mode <> disrupt user experience! (#43) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [url] IPv4 serializer should use floor(n / 256), not n/256 (#39) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [url] IPv4 serializer should use floor(n / 256), not n/256 (#39) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [url] "A URL’s port is either null or a 16-bit integer" (#76) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [url] All instances of %2e in the path should be decoded into `.` (#77) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [url] All instances of %2e in the path should be decoded into `.` (#77) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] It is unclear how tree of tress whose root tree is not a document tree should behave. (#356) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FormData additions in XHR (#87) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Resize events needed? (#149) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Potential for coordination about task scheduling (#72) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Consider support for ES2015 iterator protocol for NodeIterator (#147) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [xhr] Fix typo in FormData idl (#42) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [xhr] Fix typo in FormData idl (#42) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [xhr] Fix typo in FormData idl (#42) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "компания IMG-ФОК " (#195) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [xhr] Fix typo in FormData idl (#42) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] Fix #169: ban combination of "no-cors" and "same-origin" (#193) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] Fix #169: ban combination of "no-cors" and "same-origin" (#193) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Only run "adopting steps" if oldDocument !== document (#146) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- [fetch] Fix #169: ban combination of "no-cors" and "same-origin" (#193) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] add a missing space (#192) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] add a missing space (#192) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [fetch] add a missing space (#192) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [xhr] FormData.set has 3 params variant in implementations but not in the spec (#41) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [xhr] FormData.set has 3 params variant in implementations but not in the spec (#41) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace "flags" with "booleans" (#175) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] "Let internalResponse be response's internal res..." (#171) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] "Let internalResponse be response's internal res..." (#171) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] Add a way to copy Requests with a different URL (#191) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Question about credentials mode of no-cors mode requests. (#168) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Tests (#62) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Tests (#62) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Response.prototype.clone() should take into account the internal response. (#148) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [encoding] "gb18030 ranges" have problematic definitions (#17) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [encoding] GB 18030 2000 vs 2005 (#22) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- [encoding] Fix #22: align with GB18030-2005 (#26) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- [encoding] Fix #17: gb18030 cannot encode U+E5E5 (#25) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [encoding] GB 18030 2000 vs 2005 (#22) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [encoding] GB 18030 2000 vs 2005 (#22) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [xhr] XHR using sync warning (#40) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [fullscreen] onway lRmt (#32) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Why remove CDataSection? (#142) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [encoding] "gb18030 ranges" have problematic definitions (#17) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [encoding] "gb18030 ranges" have problematic definitions (#17) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Why remove CDataSection? (#142) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [encoding] "gb18030 ranges" have problematic definitions (#17) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Why remove CDataSection? (#142) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [encoding] Use floor() more (#23) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [encoding] Use floor() more (#23) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Why remove CDataSection? (#142) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [url] "A URL’s port is either null or a 16-bit integer" (#76) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Why are headers a special data-structure? (#154) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Why are headers a special data-structure? (#154) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Update the "determine request's referrer" algorithm link (#188) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Update the "determine request's referrer" algorithm link (#188) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [fetch] Request body should be removed when method changed to GET (#187) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [fetch] Request body should be removed when method changed to GET (#187) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Close #123: remove feature detection from add() and add supports() (ff4f0e8) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix some references around Document interface. (#108) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix some references around Document interface. (#108) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix some references around Document interface. (#108) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] More bikeshed problems (#62) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] fix minor typo (#135) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] fix minor typo (#135) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Document.documentURI and Document.URL attributes behaviour (#118) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Document.documentURI and Document.URL attributes behaviour (#118) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Document.documentURI and Document.URL attributes behaviour (#118) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Document.documentURI and Document.URL attributes behaviour (#118) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Document.documentURI and Document.URL attributes behaviour (#118) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Node#baseURI need not be nullable (#131) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Clarify what Document constructor does? (#137) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Clarify what Document constructor does? (#137) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Small correct for Mutation observers (#132) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] setAttributeNode should not change order of existing attributes (#116) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] setAttributeNode should not change order of existing attributes (#116) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix the set an attribute algorithm (#139) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] setAttributeNode should not change order of existing attributes (#116) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] setAttributeNode should not change order of existing attributes (#116) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix the set an attribute algorithm (#139) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix the set an attribute algorithm (#139) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix the set an attribute algorithm (#139) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix a typo in the replace algorithm (#138) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix a typo in the replace algorithm (#138) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix the set an attribute algorithm (#139) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] fix minor typo (#135) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees (bugzilla: 26365) (#57) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow custom cache keys for request caching (#805) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] rename before() and after() of ChildNode (#134) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] rename before() and after() of ChildNode (#134) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [dom] rename before() and after() of ChildNode (#134) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [xhr] Status 0 is missing a message (#35) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [xhr] Status 0 is missing a message (#35) (Friday, 1 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Friday, 1 January)
Anssi Kostiainen
Anthony Ramine
ArkadiuszMichalski
Aron Woost
Arun Ranganathan
balfanz
Ben
Ben Francis
Ben Kelly
- [ServiceWorker] clarify Request.isReload for sub-resources (#827) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Add a bit to Opaque Responses to distinguish redirects (#79) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make the Cache API deal with request's redirect mode not being "follow" (#737) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skip waiting flag purges active worker early (#821) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update on navigation or the subsequent updatefound event be delayed until document DOM is loaded? (#788) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Friday, 22 January)
- [ServiceWorker] skip waiting flag purges active worker early (#821) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [fetch] Only append Authorization if none is set (#198) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [streams] Target for web-platform-tests streams API tests (#411) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [streams] Target for web-platform-tests streams API tests (#411) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] The "uninstalling flag" check in ServiceWorkerRegistration.update() should be moved to the Update algorithm (#807) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] The "uninstalling flag" check in ServiceWorkerRegistration.update() should be moved to the Update algorithm (#807) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [fetch] Request body should be removed when method changed to GET (#187) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [fetch] Request body should be removed when method changed to GET (#187) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow custom cache keys for request caching (#805) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow custom cache keys for request caching (#805) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Monday, 4 January)
Ben Lesh
Benjamin Gruenbaum
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
Benjamin Strauß
Bennett Blodinger
Bob Curtice
Boris Zbarsky
- Re: [webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [webidl] Check if NodeFilter.length is defined correctly. (#83) (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ExtendableMessageEvent.source cannot be SameObject (#816) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Thursday, 14 January)
- [DOM-Parsing] Test suite link doesn't link to all the relevant tests (#3) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webidl] Move the overload resolution algorithm into a separate section. (#77) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [webidl] Move the overload resolution algorithm into a separate section. (#77) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [webidl] Check if NodeFilter.length is defined correctly. (#83) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [webidl] Check if NodeFilter.length is defined correctly. (#83) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
Cameron McCormack
chaals
Chong Zhang
Chris Van
Corey Farwell
Cory
cpigat
cynthia
Daniel Appelquist
Dave Tapuska
David Baron
- [webidl] provide clearer advice about USVString vs. DOMString (#84) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Geofencing FPWD (#89) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FormData additions in XHR (#87) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] HTTP Opportunistic Security (#80) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] HTTP Opportunistic Security (#80) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Unblocking the HTTPS Transitions (#74) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Secure / Powerful / Features / Contexts (#75) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Secure / Powerful / Features / Contexts (#75) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Secure / Powerful / Features / Contexts (#75) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Create a document to explain web platform async timing entry-points (#100) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Create a document to explain web platform async timing entry-points (#100) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Dimitri Glazkov
Domenic Denicola
- Re: [webcomponents] Add attributeFilter (#367) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Fix #197: explain cache modes (a47e1e4) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Fix #197: explain cache modes (a47e1e4) (Friday, 29 January)
- [webcomponents] Change registries to be per document and never shared between documents (#369) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- [webcomponents] Things to definitely document in non-normative notes (#368) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- [webcomponents] Add attributeFilter (#367) (Monday, 25 January)
- [webcomponents] Changes to element creation during parsing per F2F (#366) (Monday, 25 January)
- [webcomponents] Rename registerElement and change API slightly (#365) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [webidl] Rename Date to LegacyDateDoNotUse, or at least add a big warning (#66) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [url] Confused about the constructor argument types (#80) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [streams] Fix typos (#426) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [streams] Fix typos (#426) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webidl] Check if NodeFilter.length is defined correctly. (#83) (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Revisiting what's reasonable return value for each method of the controller (#424) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Description of "pull" is misleading (#425) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Added message to check in bad strategies (#422) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Added message to check in bad strategies (#422) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Investigate merging RS and RBS (#379) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FormData additions in XHR (#87) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Create a document to explain web platform async timing entry-points (#100) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Create a document to explain web platform async timing entry-points (#100) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [streams] Improved tests abour erroring a RS when enqueing (#420) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [streams] Improved tests abour erroring a RS when enqueing (#420) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace "flags" with "booleans" (#175) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Why remove CDataSection? (#142) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Supported property names for NamedNodeMap (#141) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- [fetch] Give guidance on when flags should be set, for other spec authors (#186) (Friday, 1 January)
Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Douglas Stockwell
Dylan Barrell
Edwin Taylor
Ehsan Akhgari
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [fetch] RequestCache "reload" type must also set no-cache headers (#201) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- [fetch] RequestCache "reload" type must also set no-cache headers (#201) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- [ServiceWorker] ExtendableMessageEvent.source cannot be SameObject (#816) (Saturday, 9 January)
- [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [ServiceWorker] The "uninstalling flag" check in ServiceWorkerRegistration.update() should be moved to the Update algorithm (#807) (Monday, 4 January)
Elliott Sprehn
Emily Eisenberg
Eric Lawless
Felquis Gimenes
Gary Kacmarcik
- Re: [editing] Base definition and ordering of beforeInput/input events should be in UI events, but the editing specific stuff should be in a separate editing spec. (#99) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] We should remove EditTypes/InputTypes it from the UI events spec. It should be specced in editing Spec. (#98) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [uievents-key] AudioVolume(Down|Up|Mute) shouldn't be changed from Volume(Down|Up|Mute)? (#14) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents-key] AudioVolume(Down|Up|Mute) shouldn't be changed from Volume(Down|Up|Mute)? (#14) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents-code] Mismatch between code value, Volume(Down|Up|Mute) and key value AudioVolume(Down|Up|Mut) (#8) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [editing] We should fire beforeInput event before compositioinupdate. (#101) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [editing] We should fire beforeInput event before compositioinupdate. (#101) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [uievents] We should fire beforeInput event before compositioinupdate. (#67) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [uievents] Should DOM be modified before or after compositionupdate? edge/IE do one thing, chrome/saf/firefox do another? (#66) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [editing] Should DOM be modified before or after compositionupdate? edge/IE do one thing, chrome/saf/firefox do another? (#109) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [editing] Should DOM be modified before or after compositionupdate? edge/IE do one thing, chrome/saf/firefox do another? (#109) (Wednesday, 13 January)
gked
- [editing] execCommand('inserttext',...) behavior (#112) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- [editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] Should DOM be modified before or after compositionupdate? edge/IE do one thing, chrome/saf/firefox do another? (#109) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] • Currently, there are multiple documents that pertain to editing. We should merge all the editing related specs into one (#108) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] We should ensure drag/drop also fires beforeInput (#107) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] We should keep data in UI events for beforeInput that does the text/plain serialization. We should add dataTransfer to the editing spec for other mime types(html, text with line breaks, etc) (#106) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] We could have "data" property that returns the text/plain version and a dataTransfer field for richer things. (#105) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] We should update the spec with an ImmutableStaticRange that is a subset of the Range interface and return them via the getTargetRanges method. s/ImmutableStaticRange/StaticRange/ in the actual spec (#104) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] isComposing field should be consistent with the composition events, no need to redefine it. So just provide a reference to spec. (#103) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] Chrome/Safari need to fix a bug. Compositioinupdate is not firing before the compositionend. (#102) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] We should fire beforeInput event before compositioinupdate. (#101) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] Base definition and ordering of beforeInput/input events should be in UI events, but the editing specific stuff should be in a separate editing spec. (#99) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] We should remove EditTypes/InputTypes it from the UI events spec. It should be specced in editing Spec. (#98) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] rename EditTypes to InputTypes for beforeInput events (#97) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [editing] beforeInput/input events should be fired for any element with contentEditable enabled, input and textArea elements where input element and textArea will have targetRanges set to null. (#96) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Greggman
Hallvord R. M. Steen
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Monday, 25 January)
- [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- [permissions] contributing.md file says webapps is the WG to call, while document says webappsec (#56) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Harbs
Hayato Ito
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add attributeFilter (#367) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add attributeFilter (#367) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should use `scoped` flag and not rely on trustedness (#372) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Section 5.7. Retargeting Focus Events is unclear (#374) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need mechanism to tell if an element in a ShadowRoot has been inserted into the Document (bugzilla: 22141) (#81) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot (bugzilla: 28493) (#91) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Node should expose their scope so that shared state can be scoped to components. (bugzilla: 22080) (#80) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Node should expose their scope so that shared state can be scoped to components. (bugzilla: 22080) (#80) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Restrict the types of nodes that could be assigned to a slot (#351) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Restrict the types of nodes that could be assigned to a slot (#351) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] It is unclear how tree of tress whose root tree is not a document tree should behave. (#356) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] It is unclear how tree of tress whose root tree is not a document tree should behave. (#356) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] It is unclear how tree of tress whose root tree is not a document tree should behave. (#356) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Restrict the types of nodes that could be assigned to a slot (#351) (Thursday, 14 January)
- [webcomponents] Use FrozenArray<T> in WebIDL (#361) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root (bugzilla: 27418) (#70) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Interaction between CSS and composed tree needs to be better defined (#305) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] It is unclear how tree of tress whose root tree is not a document tree should behave. (#356) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] ownerDocument of a node in a shadow tree isn't well defined (#303) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] ownerDocument of a node in a shadow tree isn't well defined (#303) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] caretPositionFromPoint, elementFromPoint, and elementsFromPoint should respect shadow boundary (#313) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Combining :host-context and :host (#359) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Combining :host-context and :host (#359) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Combining :host-context and :host (#359) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Restrict the types of nodes that could be assigned to a slot (#351) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Clarify which registry is used for the result of create*Document() (#353) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Modules proposal. (#360) (Tuesday, 5 January)
Henri Sivonen
Henry Story
hober
Ilya Grigorik
Jacob Rossi
Jake Archibald
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- [ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- [ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How to deal with cookie bombing (#704) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How to deal with cookie bombing (#704) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make the Cache API deal with request's redirect mode not being "follow" (#737) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update on navigation or the subsequent updatefound event be delayed until document DOM is loaded? (#788) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Preventing server-forced updates (#822) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Sunday, 24 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update on navigation or the subsequent updatefound event be delayed until document DOM is loaded? (#788) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should mixed content always be blocked? (#813) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Update service worker with a response object (#819) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Update service worker with a response object (#819) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [streams] Description of "pull" is misleading (#425) (Monday, 18 January)
- [streams] Description of "pull" is misleading (#425) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Question — Why can I not read the stream again ? (#196) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service worker state on system restart (#812) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service worker state on system restart (#812) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Request body should be removed when method changed to GET (#187) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Monday, 4 January)
- [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Monday, 4 January)
- [fetch] Request body should be removed when method changed to GET (#187) (Monday, 4 January)
James Dunne
Jan Miksovsky
jan-ivar
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Sunday, 17 January)
Jeff
Jeff Griffiths
Jeff Hodges
Jeffrey Yasskin
jeisinger
Johannes Wilm
- Re: [editing] We should update the spec with an ImmutableStaticRange that is a subset of the Range interface and return them via the getTargetRanges method. s/ImmutableStaticRange/StaticRange/ in the actual spec (#104) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] isComposing field should be consistent with the composition events, no need to redefine it. So just provide a reference to spec. (#103) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] isComposing field should be consistent with the composition events, no need to redefine it. So just provide a reference to spec. (#103) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] Chrome/Safari need to fix a bug. Compositioinupdate is not firing before the compositionend. (#102) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] Chrome/Safari need to fix a bug. Compositioinupdate is not firing before the compositionend. (#102) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] Base definition and ordering of beforeInput/input events should be in UI events, but the editing specific stuff should be in a separate editing spec. (#99) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] We should remove EditTypes/InputTypes it from the UI events spec. It should be specced in editing Spec. (#98) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] We should remove EditTypes/InputTypes it from the UI events spec. It should be specced in editing Spec. (#98) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] Chrome/Safari need to fix a bug. Compositioinupdate is not firing before the compositionend. (#102) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] isComposing field should be consistent with the composition events, no need to redefine it. So just provide a reference to spec. (#103) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] We should keep data in UI events for beforeInput that does the text/plain serialization. We should add dataTransfer to the editing spec for other mime types(html, text with line breaks, etc) (#106) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [editing] rename EditTypes to InputTypes for beforeInput events (#97) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [editing] rename EditTypes to InputTypes for beforeInput events (#97) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [editing] Revert "Remove ContentEditableTrue" (#111) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- [editing] Revert "Remove ContentEditableTrue" (#111) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
Jonas Sicking
JongChan Choi
Josh Karlin
Josh Mangum
Josh Matthews
Joshua Bell
JP Sugarbroad
Jungkee Song
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skip waiting flag purges active worker early (#821) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skip waiting flag purges active worker early (#821) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should the active worker move to environment settings object? (#811) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ExtendableMessageEvent.source cannot be SameObject (#816) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ExtendableMessageEvent.source cannot be SameObject (#816) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Thursday, 14 January)
- [ServiceWorker] Is a new property to get the navigation's target client needed? (#817) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Editorial: Reword normative uses of "can" (#795) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent's constructor's second argument must be optional (#815) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove frameType, maybe add ancestorOrigins (#732) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- [ServiceWorker] Should the active worker move to environment settings object? (#811) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] navigations that are not intercepted should still allow interception on further redirects (#793) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Implement API to reject PUSH_PROMISEs sent by the server over HTTP/2 (#796) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we add some options to ClientQueryOptions? (#801) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we add some options to ClientQueryOptions? (#801) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can create caches in the persistent storage? (#803) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() in service worker navigation fetch event (#804) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] The "uninstalling flag" check in ServiceWorkerRegistration.update() should be moved to the Update algorithm (#807) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] The "uninstalling flag" check in ServiceWorkerRegistration.update() should be moved to the Update algorithm (#807) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] The "uninstalling flag" check in ServiceWorkerRegistration.update() should be moved to the Update algorithm (#807) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Tuesday, 5 January)
jungshik
Justin Fagnani
Kane York
Karl Groves
Karthik VJ
Keith Yeung
Kenji Baheux
Kevin Suttle
Kit Cambridge
Lewis Phạm
Loren Brichter
Manas Tungare
Marcos Caceres
- Re: [manifest] Icon schema considerations (#422) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [manifest] Icon schema considerations (#422) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [manifest] Enable RDFa (#420) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [manifest] Enable RDFa (#420) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [manifest] Icon schema considerations (#422) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [manifest] Accessible Platform Architectures WG review (#419) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [manifest] Support for deep integrations, e.g. OpenSearch (#421) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [manifest] Support for deep integrations, e.g. OpenSearch (#421) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [manifest] Support for deep integrations, e.g. OpenSearch (#421) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [manifest] Accessible Platform Architectures WG review (#419) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [manifest] Accessible Platform Architectures WG review (#419) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [manifest] Accessible Platform Architectures WG review (#419) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [directory-upload] Bikeshed: getFilesAndDirectories() (#25) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [directory-upload] Bikeshed: getFilesAndDirectories() (#25) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [manifest] Add integrity to image objects (#411) (Tuesday, 26 January)
Marijn Kruisselbrink
Mark Nottingham
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Security Questionnaire (#77) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] W3C Push API - data payloads (#98) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] HTTP 451 Status (#99) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] W3C Push API - data payloads (#98) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Web Background Sync API (#95) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review Web Annotations specs (#93) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FormData additions in XHR (#87) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Network Information API (#86) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Network Information API (#86) (Thursday, 14 January)
- [spec-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Security Questionnaire (#77) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] HTTP 451 Status (#99) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [fetch] Give guidance on when flags should be set, for other spec authors (#186) (Sunday, 3 January)
MarkWaka
Martin Thomson
- [push-api] Expose PushSubscriptionOptions value on PushSubscription (#184) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [push-api] Can you change the value of PushSubscriptionOptions (#183) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [push-api] Provide support for subscription association (#182) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [push-api] Provide support for subscription association (#182) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [push-api] Fire pushsubscriptionchange when user revokes permission (#116) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [push-api] Voluntary server identification, WebCrypto version (#180) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [push-api] Voluntary server identification, WebCrypto version (#180) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [push-api] It's PushEvent, not PushMessageEvent (#181) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- [push-api] A lower level version of #180 (#182) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- [push-api] It's PushEvent, not PushMessageEvent (#181) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- [push-api] Voluntary server identification, WebCrypto version (#180) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [push-api] Rewriting push event handling; allowing data to be optional. (#166) (Friday, 15 January)
- [push-api] Add applicability statement (#179) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Masayuki Nakano
Mathias Bynens
Matt Falkenhagen
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should subresource FetchEvents trigger an update if 24-hours since last check? (#814) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update on navigation or the subsequent updatefound event be delayed until document DOM is loaded? (#788) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [ServiceWorker] What is FetchEvent.clientId for navigation requests (#808) (Tuesday, 5 January)
Michael van Ouwerkerk
Michał Wadas
Mike West
Mitar
Mounir Lamouri
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [permissions] contributing.md file says webapps is the WG to call, while document says webappsec (#56) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [permissions] Update contributing.md (#58) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [permissions] contributing.md file says webapps is the WG to call, while document says webappsec (#56) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- [permissions] Update contributing.md (#58) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Monday, 18 January)
- [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Saturday, 16 January)
Ms2ger
Mustaq Ahmed
Nick Doty
Nico Schlömer
Onwayrmt
Owen Campbell-Moore
Patrick H. Lauke
Paul J. Boyes
Pedram Emrouznejad
Peter Beverloo
Peter Linss
Peter Occil
Petka Antonov
Philip Jägenstedt
- Re: [selection-api] Add a "Selection interface" section (#29) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [uievents] CustomEvent.initCustomEvent() is in DOM (#45) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [encoding] What's the correct choice for BIG5 F9FE? (#28) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- [dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [selection-api] The node argument of collapse and setPosition should be nullable (#64) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Monday, 11 January)
Philippe Le Hegaret
r12a
Ranganathan B
Rick Byers
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Sunday, 31 January)
- Re: [uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [touch-events] createTouch has all the params as required, should probably have them optional (#58) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [touch-events] createTouch has all the params as required, should probably have them optional (#58) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [touch-events] createTouch has all the params as required, should probably have them optional (#58) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [touch-events] createTouch has all the params as required, should probably have them optional (#58) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions and passive event listeners (#82) (Monday, 4 January)
Rune Lillesveen
Ryosuke Niwa
- Re: [webcomponents] Add attributeFilter (#367) (Saturday, 30 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [webcomponents] Treatment of retargeting focus events is ambiguous (#374) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [webcomponents] Event path trimming should use `scoped` flag and not rely on trustedness (#372) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Wednesday, 27 January)
- [webcomponents] attributeChanged callback should be invoked on every attribute upon creation (#364) (Saturday, 23 January)
- [webcomponents] Disallow extension of subclasses of HTMLElement and SVGElement/MathMLElement (#363) (Saturday, 23 January)
- [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM (bugzilla: 26850) (#56) (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM (bugzilla: 26850) (#56) (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM (bugzilla: 26850) (#56) (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Restrict the types of nodes that could be assigned to a slot (#351) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] It is unclear how tree of tress whose root tree is not a document tree should behave. (#356) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [webcomponents] Restrict the types of nodes that could be assigned to a slot (#351) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [selection-api] The spec doesn't define event handlers onselectstart and onselectionchange (#55) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [selection-api] The spec doesn't define event handlers onselectstart and onselectionchange (#55) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [selection-api] The node argument of collapse and setPosition should be nullable (#64) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [selection-api] The node argument of collapse and setPosition should be nullable (#64) (Sunday, 10 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
- [editing] Remove ContentEditableTrue (#95) (Saturday, 9 January)
Salvador de la Puente González
Sandeep More
Scott Kyle
Shane McCarron
Simon Pieters
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- [dom] Fix #146: Only run adopting steps when changing documents (#151) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- [streams] Fix typos (#426) (Monday, 18 January)
- [dom] Only run "adopting steps" if oldDocument !== document (#146) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- [url] "A URL’s port is either null or a 16-bit integer" (#76) (Tuesday, 5 January)
Simon Sapin
smaug----
stefan hakansson
Steve Orvell
Steven Lambert
Stuart P. Bentley
Tab Atkins Jr.
Takayoshi Kochi
Takeshi Kurosawa
Takeshi Yoshino
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [streams] Revisiting what's reasonable return value for each method of the controller (#424) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [streams] Revisiting what's reasonable return value for each method of the controller (#424) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [streams] Description of "pull" is misleading (#425) (Monday, 18 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Investigate merging RS and RBS (#379) (Friday, 15 January)
- [streams] Revisiting what's reasonable return value for each method of the controller (#424) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] ReadableByteStream needs reference implementation/tests (#355) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] ReadableByteStream needs reference implementation/tests (#355) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Consider moving stuff into ReadableStreamController (#364) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Consider moving stuff into ReadableStreamController (#364) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Question — Why can I not read the stream again ? (#196) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Investigate merging RS and RBS (#379) (Friday, 15 January)
- [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] ReadableByteStream: pull + pullInto or just pullInto (#363) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] ReadableByteStream: pull + pullInto or just pullInto (#363) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Investigate merging RS and RBS (#379) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Investigate merging RS and RBS (#379) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Rename ReadableByteStream (#405) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [fetch] "no-cors" and credentials mode (#169) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [streams] Move stuff into controller to make RS and RBS closer (#418) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [streams] Fix the spec for the last commit (4ba861e) (Thursday, 7 January)
- [fetch] Update the "determine request's referrer" algorithm link (#188) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [streams] Style guide (#421) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [streams] Fill the internal slots section of ReadableByteStreamController (#417) (Tuesday, 5 January)
The Jared Wilcurt
Thomas Jensen
Tito
Tobie Langel
Travis Leithead
- Re: [uievents] CustomEvent.initCustomEvent() is in DOM (#45) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] CustomEvent.initCustomEvent() is in DOM (#45) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] FocusEvent.initFocusEvent is not needed for web compat (#44) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] FocusEvent.initFocusEvent is not needed for web compat (#44) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] Reference to createEvent("FocusEvent") (#41) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] Reference to createEvent("FocusEvent") (#41) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] Should not recommend DocumentEvent.createEvent (#51) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] Should not recommend DocumentEvent.createEvent (#51) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] scroll should be a simple Event not a UIEvent (#47) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] scroll should be a simple Event not a UIEvent (#47) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] Broken links make documentation useless (#53) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [uievents] Broken links make documentation useless (#53) (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Streams General issue (#92) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Write up the Secure Stop issue for ddorwin (#73) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Write up the Secure Stop issue for ddorwin (#73) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Sketch out proposals for event synthesis/flow and reusable a11y behavior (#63) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Presentation API Request for Feedback (#61) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- [spec-reviews] Create a document to explain web platform async timing entry-points (#100) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Performance Observer Review (formerly Navigation Timing 2 concepts) (#18) (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [dom] Consider adding more utils to Elements (#145) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Feedback on DOMError -> DOMException in Indexed DB (#88) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Why remove CDataSection? (#142) (Wednesday, 6 January)
Tsuyoshi Horo
Tushar Mathur
Valentin Gosu
Vijay Bharadwaj
vyv03354
Wei Wang
Wenbo Zhu
Wes
Xabier Rodríguez
Xiaoqian Wu
Yamagishi Kazutoshi
Yoav Weiss
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- [dom] Added an example showing feature detection with supports() (#144) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [dom] Close #123: remove feature detection from add() and add supports() (ff4f0e8) (Monday, 4 January)
- Re: [dom] Fix #119: Merge DOMSettableTokenList into DOMTokenList (#120) (Monday, 4 January)
Yonggang Luo
- Re: [encoding] Creating test suites for each encoding. (#30) (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Saturday, 23 January)
- [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Friday, 22 January)
- [encoding] Creating test suites for each encoding. (#30) (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [encoding] What's the correct choice for BIG5 F9FE? (#28) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Tuesday, 19 January)
- [encoding] What's the correct choice for BIG5 F9FE? (#28) (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Sunday, 17 January)
- [encoding] Remove the last 14 characters PUA of GB18030-2005 (#27) (Sunday, 17 January)
youennf
- Re: [fetch] Should request constructor throw in case of invalid enumeration parameter (#208) (Friday, 29 January)
- [fetch] Should user be prompted in case Request credentials is set to "omit" (#209) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [fetch] Should request constructor throw in case of invalid enumeration parameter (#208) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Friday, 15 January)
- Re: [streams] Target for web-platform-tests streams API tests (#411) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [streams] Target for web-platform-tests streams API tests (#411) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [streams] Target for web-platform-tests streams API tests (#411) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Behavior unspecified with multiple headers with same name (#190) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Why are headers a special data-structure? (#154) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [fetch] Can headers ordering be lessened? (#189) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Why are headers a special data-structure? (#154) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [fetch] Why are headers a special data-structure? (#154) (Tuesday, 5 January)
Yutaka Hirano
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 25 January)
- [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 21 January)
- [fetch] Fix a typo on "constructing a ReadableStream" algorithm. (#199) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Yves Lafon
ᴍᴀᴛᴛ ʙᴇʟʟ
⭐caitp⭐
Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2016 23:40:27 UTC