Re: [encoding] Consider making the DOM name the canonical name (#32)

I don't think so. I mostly did it to keep the weird casing out of other potential future uses, but those should probably not exist since there's utf-8. (Note that it's not 100% IANA casing. E.g., `GB18030` is `gb18030` in DOM.)

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/32#issuecomment-174297359