- From: Simon Sapin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:49:05 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:49:36 UTC
Yes, but more generally it’s good for the thing that maintain an invariant (such as "this string is non-empty") to be close to the things that rely on that invariant. The URL parser algorithm is full of things like that: one bit of pseudo-code relies on another bit of pseudo-code that doesn’t seem directly related to have had some non-obvious side effect. It’s not *wrong*, but it makes it harder for humans to read the algorithm without making mistakes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/79#issuecomment-173740653
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:49:36 UTC