- From: Rick Byers <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:08:58 -0800
- To: w3c/touch-events <touch-events@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 4 January 2016 22:09:37 UTC
Both the test and the spec use 7 arguments, so I'm not seeing the issue there. But still they should perhaps be optional. They're certainly optional in blink, but I haven't tested other engines. @choniong WDYT? Also the "magic" clientX/Y behavior is how this API has always worked on at least Safari and Chrome AFAIK. There is some precedent for this sort of thing (eg. MouseEvent.pageX/pageY), but we ultimately decided not to follow that pattern for the constructors: #28 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/touch-events/issues/58#issuecomment-168826371
Received on Monday, 4 January 2016 22:09:37 UTC