- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:38:58 -0800
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2016 03:39:33 UTC
> although the plan in the Houdini group was to write a separate rendering pipeline document, and presumably then make a pull request to change a few of the list items in the HTML spec's event loop description to refer to an entirely separate (and probably substantially larger) spec. That makes a lot of sense to me; I agree that HTML's "update the rendering" (step 7) would largely best be handled by the CSSWG. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/100#issuecomment-171152719
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2016 03:39:33 UTC