Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82)

I guess we could add something for this case, but is it really worth the effort?  If no one is supposed to ever use this again, then new specs will simply not say anything is unenumerable and existing specs can just stay as-is.

Note that named properties in general are something I think should not happen again, of course.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/82#issuecomment-168601882