Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) from Anne van Kesteren on 2016-01-04 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2016)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:56:12 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/82/168751750@github.com>

I'd basically see it as a refactoring of legacy code. Rather than eight more or less duplicate paragraphs of prose, define it once in IDL. Not high priority, but not wrong either.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/82#issuecomment-168751750

Received on Monday, 4 January 2016 17:56:43 UTC