- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:49:47 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 16:50:19 UTC
Regarding with the naming, We should definitely avoid using `InsertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument`. As we have decided not to extend the meaning of 'in a document' in #57, we should avoid re-using 'insertedIntoDocument' also here. It would be nice that the new name should be consistent with this issue #81, where `Node.inDocumentDeeply` is tentatively proposed. However, I do not like a term of 'in a document deeply' as a web-facing API name. My naive idea: How about using a term of *connected*? Does it sound bad ida? So my preference 1. `connectedIntoDocument/disconnectedIntoDocument` (If we prefer explicit long name) 2. `inserted/removed` (If we prefer a short name, however, we still need a good name for https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/81) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/362#issuecomment-175739737
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 16:50:19 UTC