public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2015 by author

Adam Klein

• Re: [dom] Path HTML's base URL stuff to be in terms of DOM (#61) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Adam Miller

• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Thursday, 24 September)

Alex Lu

• [manifest] Maintain list of sites that have a manifest (#404) (Friday, 25 September)

Alex Russell

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Worker-As-A-Service service workers (#744) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [spec-reviews] Write up the Secure Stop issue for ddorwin (#73) (Monday, 14 September)
• [spec-reviews] Potential for coordination about task scheduling (#72) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Friday, 4 September)

aliams

• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] getFilesAndDirectories should match that in FileSystem API (#7) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Repository redirect or Organization redirect to MicrosoftEdge (#4) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Repository redirect or Organization redirect to MicrosoftEdge (#4) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Repository redirect or Organization redirect to MicrosoftEdge (#4) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] UI musts are a no-no (#16) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] polyfill: folder -> directory (#5) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Don't respecify the superinterface when specifying partial interface HTMLInputElement (#12) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Don't respecify the superinterface when specifying partial interface HTMLInputElement (#12) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] UI musts are a no-no (#16) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Is "sequence<File or Directory>" syntax correct/legal? (#9) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] polyfill: folder -> directory (#5) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] It isn't clear whether Directory.path should include the name of the directory itself (#10) (Wednesday, 9 September)

Andrea Giammarchi

• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] the `extends` property cannot be replaced (#326) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] the `extends` property cannot be replaced (#326) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] the `extends` property cannot be replaced (#326) (Monday, 21 September)
• [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] the `extends` property cannot be replaced (#326) (Monday, 21 September)

Andrea Marchesini

• [FileAPI] Cloning a Blob and then close the original one, does it change the state of the cloned one? (#18) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [FileAPI] Constructing a new blob from a closed blob (#17) (Wednesday, 9 September)

Andrew Lukjanov

• [fetch] Is it safe to use Fetch API already? (#132) (Monday, 28 September)

Andy Earnshaw

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] How should element.requestFullscreen(); work in shadow dom (bugzilla: 27379) (#180) (Monday, 28 September)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [ServiceWorker] consult document CSP in Register algorithm (#755) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [fetch] force-Origin-header flag set for no-cors requests (#91) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [fetch] Content-Length on HEAD (#135) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [fetch] Content-Length on HEAD (#135) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] ::backdrop of root (#24) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] ::backdrop of root (#24) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [fetch] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#134) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Fix typo conneciton -> connection (#133) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Is it safe to use Fetch API already? (#132) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Is it safe to use Fetch API already? (#132) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Proposal: response.xml() (#16) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce "connection pool" and a concept of a "connection" (#114) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce "connection pool" and a concept of a "connection" (#114) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [fetch] Preconnect via Fetch? (#114) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reference ABNF spec (#131) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [fetch] Preconnect via Fetch? (#114) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce "navigate" mode (#126) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [fetch] Preconnect via Fetch? (#114) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce "navigate" mode (#126) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] UI musts are a no-no (#16) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reference ABNF spec (#131) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] UI musts are a no-no (#16) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions (#82) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] This should be part of whatwg/html (#15) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions (#82) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions (#82) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [directory-upload] IDL members not defined in terms of "apply" and "do not apply" (#18) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] UI musts are a no-no (#16) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [directory-upload] UI musts are a no-no (#16) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [directory-upload] This should be part of whatwg/html (#15) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] 206/304 handling broken? (#97) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Allow operation to outlive the document unloading (beacon) (#124) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] allow opaqueredirect to be returned for any Request with "manual" RedirectMode (#127) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] RequestCredentials "same-origin" does not work in "no-cors" mode (#130) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Should EventInit contain 'timestamp'? (#76) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow should fail on a slot element (#327) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow should fail on a slot element (#327) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Consider making `timestamp` a DOMHighResTimestamp (#80) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Add locale-aware sorting (#38) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Read-only OS time formatting preferences (#79) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Read-only OS time formatting preferences (#79) (Monday, 21 September)
• [IndexedDB] Add locale-aware sorting (#38) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Should EventInit contain 'timestamp'? (#76) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] MutationObserver callbacks should be called before executing defer scritps (#78) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] MutationObserver callbacks should be called before executing defer scritps (#78) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [xhr] Make setRequestHeader() normalize header values just like Fetch does and update HTTP references. Fixes https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 (90c79d0) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [xhr] Make setRequestHeader() normalize header values just like Fetch does and update HTTP references. Fixes https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 (90c79d0) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Incorrect link in createEvent definition (#73) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Request for support for certificate pinning (#98) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Request for support for certificate pinning (#98) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Deal with nested browsing contexts (#120) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Deal with nested browsing contexts (#120) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] blob scheme with non-GET method (#125) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] blob scheme with non-GET method (#125) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#72) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add a missing quote. (#123) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Fix "nosniff?" link in order to avoid anolis bug. (#122) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Fix "nosniff?" link in order to avoid anolis bug. (#122) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [dom] Make two loops to adopt a node (#71) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] force-Origin-header flag set for no-cors requests (#91) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Fix quotation of "error" response type. (#117) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Fix quotation of "error" response type. (#117) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fetch] Deal with nested browsing contexts (#120) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [encoding] Big5 encoder treats a code point as error when both an HKSCS and non-HKSCS pointer exists for the code point (#9) (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: [dom] Run the adopting steps recursively (#66) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [dom] Missing spaces in rendered spec HTML (#65) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 4 September)
• [DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose not to render ::backdrop if the corresponding element is not rendered (#20) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Add caniuse info boxes like the HTML spec (#69) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [fetch] force-Origin-header flag set for no-cors requests (#91) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [fetch] force-Origin-header flag set for no-cors requests (#91) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [fetch] force-Origin-header flag set for no-cors requests (#91) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [dom] Run the adopting steps recursively (#66) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [dom] Run the adopting steps recursively (#66) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [dom] Consider specifying document.evaluate and document.createNSResolver (#67) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Enumerate the element names which don't support createShadowRoot(), instead of looking at the binding property (#110) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Enumerate the element names which don't support createShadowRoot(), instead of looking at the binding property (#110) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] ownerDocument of a node in a shadow tree isn't well defined (#303) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [encoding] Big5 encoder treats a code point as error when both an HKSCS and non-HKSCS pointer exists for the code point (#9) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [dom] Missing spaces in rendered spec HTML (#65) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [dom] Path HTML's base URL stuff to be in terms of DOM (#61) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [uievents] #event-type-input and #event-type-beforeinput appear to have gone missing (#2) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Anthony Ramine

• [webidl] Fix the SerializerRest production rule (#58) (Friday, 25 September)
• [dom] Make two loops to adopt a node (#71) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Run the adopting steps recursively (#66) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [dom] Run the adopting steps recursively (#66) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [dom] Run the adopting steps recursively (#66) (Thursday, 3 September)

aphillips

• Re: [IndexedDB] Add locale-aware sorting (#38) (Monday, 21 September)

ArkadiuszMichalski

• Re: [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: [charter-html] Require CfC for group decisions (136bb1f) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [webcomponents] Fragment error for "#encapsulation" (#334) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [webcomponents] css3-ui no longer defines nav-index (#333) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Draft WD for publication in October 2015 (#62) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [touch-events] force property? (#30) (Monday, 28 September)
• [webcomponents] Draft WD to be published on or around 2015-Oct-08 (#332) (Monday, 28 September)
• [selection-api] Draft WD for publication in October 2015 (#62) (Monday, 28 September)
• [selection-api] Fix syntax/typo (#61) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [charter-html] David Singer's comments (#120) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [charter-html] Comments from Josh Soref (#116) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: [directory-upload] getFilesAndDirectories should match that in FileSystem API (#7) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] getFilesAndDirectories should match that in FileSystem API (#7) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] getFilesAndDirectories should match that in FileSystem API (#7) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] getFilesAndDirectories should match that in FileSystem API (#7) (Monday, 28 September)

Ashley (Scirra)

• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Editorial changes (#10) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#7) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] How to understand this extension (#6) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] How to understand this extension (#6) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#1) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#1) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#7) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#7) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] How to understand this extension (#6) (Thursday, 10 September)

Ben Kelly

• [ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] consult document CSP in Register algorithm (#755) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] consult document CSP in Register algorithm (#755) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [ServiceWorker] consult document CSP in Register algorithm (#755) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] how does SoftUpdate "force bypass cache flag" get set? (#753) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [ServiceWorker] how does SoftUpdate "force bypass cache flag" get set? (#753) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] allow opaqueredirect to be returned for any Request with "manual" RedirectMode (#127) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WindowClient.navigate() for the same origin but off-scope clients (#752) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce "navigate" mode (#126) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce "navigate" mode (#126) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] 24 hour spontaneous update doesn't seem specced (#514) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [fetch] RequestCredentials "same-origin" does not work in "no-cors" mode (#130) (Friday, 18 September)
• [fetch] RequestCredentials "same-origin" does not work in "no-cors" mode (#130) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] provide a way to construct a new Request from an old Request and an overriding URL (#129) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] provide a way to construct a new Request from an old Request and an overriding URL (#129) (Friday, 18 September)
• [fetch] provide a way to construct a new Request from an old Request and an overriding URL (#129) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [fetch] allow opaqueredirect to be returned for any Request with "manual" RedirectMode (#127) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] Navigate likely needs to be "no-cors" after all, need to update security checks (#126) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fetch] blob scheme with non-GET method (#125) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [streams] Add IsReadableStreamDisturbed predicate (#385) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [streams] Add IsReadableStreamDisturbed predicate (#385) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker scriptURL XSS Filtering (#743) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 24 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Handling of data URLs (#111) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webidl] "it is not possible for a single platform object to implement both interfaces" (#59) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Monday, 21 September)
• [dom] Incorrect link in createEvent definition (#73) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webidl] Allow unions of dictionaries with a common base dictionary, in return values (#57) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Brian Kardell

• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] the `extends` property cannot be replaced (#326) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: [webidl] Fix the SerializerRest production rule (#58) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webidl] Fix the SerializerRest production rule (#58) (Sunday, 27 September)

chaals

• Re: [charter-html] Require CfC for group decisions (136bb1f) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Require CfC for group decisions (136bb1f) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Require CfC for group decisions (136bb1f) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Sunday, 13 September)

Chris Peterson

• [editing] Firefox 41+ supports the cut and copy commands without setting a pref (#89) (Friday, 25 September)

Chris Rebert

• [dom] Add caniuse info boxes like the HTML spec (#69) (Friday, 4 September)
• [dom] Missing spaces in rendered spec HTML (#65) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Christophe Dumez

• Re: [dom] "A DOMSettableTokenList object is equivalent to ..." (#81) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [dom] "A DOMSettableTokenList object is equivalent to ..." (#81) (Monday, 21 September)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: [spec-reviews] Create a "advice for spec authors" page (#78) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Timing 2 (#18) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Timing 2 (#18) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Timing 2 (#18) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [spec-reviews] Create a "advice for spec authors" page (#78) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [spec-reviews] Security Questionnaire (#77) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Web NFC API (#22) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Frame Timing API (#56) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Frame Timing API (#56) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Frame Timing API (#56) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Frame Timing API (#56) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Media Capture and Streams (#57) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Media Capture and Streams (#57) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Media Capture and Streams (#57) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] File URI Scheme (#59) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] File URI Scheme (#59) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] File URI Scheme (#59) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] File URI Scheme (#59) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Presentation API Request for Feedback (#61) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Clear Site Data (#62) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Clear Site Data (#62) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Clear Site Data (#62) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Review Payments Working Group Charter (#67) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Review Payments Working Group Charter (#67) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Review Payments Working Group Charter (#67) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Find out if the Battery Status API people need our feedback (#68) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Find out if the Battery Status API people need our feedback (#68) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Media TF discussion (#69) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Media TF discussion (#69) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Secure / Powerful / Features / Contexts (#75) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [spec-reviews] Secure / Powerful / Features / Contexts (#75) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Unblocking the HTTPS Transitions (#74) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [spec-reviews] Unblocking the HTTPS Transitions (#74) (Tuesday, 15 September)

David Baron

• Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Timing 2 (#18) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)

davidsgrogan

• [spec-reviews] Storage persistence (#85) (Thursday, 24 September)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Monday, 14 September)
• [webcomponents] Spec examples need to be updated to use the new syntax (#318) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 3 September)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• [webidl] "it is not possible for a single platform object to implement both interfaces" (#59) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] This should be part of whatwg/html (#15) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] directory content attribute not defined (#17) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [streams] Removed reduntant test for negative strategy.highWaterMark (#395) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [streams] Removed reduntant test for negative strategy.highWaterMark (#395) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [streams] Fixed test about cancelling a released reader, promise should reject. (#394) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [streams] Fixed test about cancelling a released reader, promise should reject. (#394) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Create a "advice for spec authors" page (#78) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [streams] Add an example of piping to a writable stream for consuming a readable stream (#393) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [streams] Add an example of piping to a writable stream for consuming a readable stream (#393) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow on replaced elements (#312) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [dom] Consider specifying document.evaluate and document.createNSResolver (#67) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [streams] Port precise flow control to writable streams (#318) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [streams] Add an example of piping to a writable stream for consuming a readable stream (#393) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Enumerate the element names which don't support createShadowRoot(), instead of looking at the binding property (#110) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Dominic Cooney

• [webcomponents] Type extensions in SVG use shadow trees--specify, or add a note if no specification is necessary (#335) (Wednesday, 30 September)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [spec-reviews] Media Capture and Streams (#57) (Wednesday, 16 September)

Douglas Stockwell

• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Tuesday, 22 September)

dwsinger

• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Saturday, 5 September)

dzmrf

• Re: [push-api] What push daily sending limit have GCM from single account? (#163) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• [push-api] What push daily sending limit have GCM from single account? (#163) (Monday, 7 September)

Ehsan Akhgari

• Re: [selection-api] Selection events for text controls (#53) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Event handlers missing (#60) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Selection events for text controls (#53) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Selection events for text controls (#53) (Friday, 11 September)

Elliott Sprehn

• Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Friday, 11 September)

Eric Bidelman

• Re: [webcomponents] Spec examples need to be updated to use the new syntax (#318) (Friday, 11 September)

Florian Rivoal

• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Saturday, 19 September)

Francesco Iovine

• Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Sunday, 27 September)

François Daoust

• Re: [spec-reviews] Presentation API Request for Feedback (#61) (Wednesday, 16 September)

Frederico Caldeira Knabben

• Re: [editing] RESOLUTION: have a relatedEvent to point to the UI event that caused a DI event to be fired (#82) (Thursday, 3 September)

gked

• Re: [editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Friday, 4 September)

Hayato Ito

• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Draft WD to be published on or around 2015-Oct-08 (#332) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Draft WD to be published on or around 2015-Oct-08 (#332) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow should fail on a slot element (#327) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow should fail on a slot element (#327) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Spec examples need to be updated to use the new syntax (#318) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Spec examples need to be updated to use the new syntax (#318) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be of type HTMLSlotElement (#320) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be of type HTMLSlotElement (#320) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Spec examples need to be updated to use the new syntax (#318) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Spec the v1 (#289) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Spec the v1 (#289) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Introduction section shouldn't refer to a Shadow DOM 101 article (#301) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The order of node trees is not well defined when one tree is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The order of node trees is not well defined when one tree is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Fix #307] Define "Assigned Slot" (ce3fe1c) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow on replaced elements (#312) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow on replaced elements (#312) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] caretPositionFromPoint, elementFromPoint, and elementsFromPoint should respect shadow boundary (#313) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The order of node trees is not well defined when one tree is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The order of node trees is not well defined when one tree is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] "Assigned slot" is not well defined (#307) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] "Assigned slot" is not well defined (#307) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Interaction between CSS and composed tree needs to be better defined (#305) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Introduction section shouldn't refer to a Shadow DOM 101 article (#301) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow shouldn't have a fixed list of elements to throw (#309) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow shouldn't have a fixed list of elements to throw (#309) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a custom pseudo-elements proposal (#299) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: [encoding] Big5 encoder treats a code point as error when both an HKSCS and non-HKSCS pointer exists for the code point (#9) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [encoding] Big5 encoder treats a code point as error when both an HKSCS and non-HKSCS pointer exists for the code point (#9) (Wednesday, 2 September)

hfmanson

• [webcomponents] Proposal: Add namespace property to ElementRegistrationOptions parameter of Document.registerElement (#328) (Thursday, 24 September)

hiroshige-g

• [fetch] blob scheme with non-GET method (#125) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [fetch] The empty string is rejected as header values (#115) (Tuesday, 1 September)

HunterJoe

• Re: [clipboard-apis] Should queryCommandEnabled(cut|copy|paste) trigger onbefore* events? (#4) (Thursday, 17 September)

Ilya Grigorik

• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Preconnect via Fetch? (#114) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [fetch] Preconnect via Fetch? (#114) (Saturday, 26 September)
• [spec-reviews] Network Information API (#86) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] Preconnect via Fetch? (#114) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] Allow operation to outlive the document unloading (beacon) (#124) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [fetch] Allow operation to outlive the document unloading (beacon) (#124) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Wednesday, 16 September)

István Szmozsánszky

• [ServiceWorker] Worker-As-A-Service service workers (#744) (Friday, 4 September)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] Drafting the patches to HTML (#106) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] openWindow with a WebApp manifests (#720) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Worker-As-A-Service service workers (#744) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Option to require response.ok (#103) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Is fetchEvent.client a performance concern? (#723) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602) (Tuesday, 1 September)

James Burke

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Worker-As-A-Service service workers (#744) (Saturday, 5 September)

Jan Miksovsky

• Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Monday, 14 September)

jan-ivar

• Re: [webidl] Allow unions of dictionaries with a common base dictionary, in return values (#57) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• [webidl] Allow unions of dictionaries with a common base dictionary, in return values (#57) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Jeff Burtoft

• Re: [manifest] List expected permissions in the manifest. (#395) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [manifest] List expected permissions in the manifest. (#395) (Monday, 14 September)

jeffjaffe

• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Friday, 18 September)

Jeffrey Posnick

• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker scriptURL XSS Filtering (#743) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker scriptURL XSS Filtering (#743) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Jeremy Archer

• [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker scriptURL XSS Filtering (#743) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Jimmy Karl Roland Wärting

• [permissions] navigator.permissions.request (#48) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [permissions] Add getUserMedia permissions (#10) (Wednesday, 23 September)

Joe Marini

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Friday, 4 September)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [editing] Firefox 41+ supports the cut and copy commands without setting a pref (#89) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [editing] Firefox 41+ supports the cut and copy commands without setting a pref (#89) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [editing] The web doesn't need another badly implemented API (#88) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [editing] The web doesn't need another badly implemented API (#88) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] RESOLUTION: have a relatedEvent to point to the UI event that caused a DI event to be fired (#82) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [uievents] #event-type-input and #event-type-beforeinput appear to have gone missing (#2) (Tuesday, 1 September)

John Mellor

• Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Saturday, 5 September)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [IndexedDB] Add locale-aware sorting (#38) (Monday, 21 September)

Jonathan Watt

• Re: [directory-upload] Specify what HTMLInputElement::getFilesAndDirectories returns when the input type is not 'file' (#13) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Specify what HTMLInputElement::getFilesAndDirectories returns when the input type is not 'file' (#13) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] The spec should define integration with FormData (#14) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] HTMLInputElement.getFilesAndDirectories should not throw (#20) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] HTMLInputElement.getFilesAndDirectories should not throw (#20) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [directory-upload] HTMLInputElement.getFilesAndDirectories should not throw (#20) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Is "sequence<File or Directory>" syntax correct/legal? (#9) (Monday, 21 September)
• [directory-upload] The spec should define integration with FormData (#14) (Monday, 14 September)
• [directory-upload] Specify what HTMLInputElement::getFilesAndDirectories returns when the input type is not 'file' (#13) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Consider how HTMLInputElement.getFilesAndDirectories could be used to avoid I/O blocking for FILE picking (#11) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [directory-upload] Don't respecify the superinterface when specifying partial interface HTMLInputElement (#12) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [directory-upload] Consider how HTMLInputElement.getFilesAndDirectories could be used to avoid I/O blocking for FILE picking (#11) (Thursday, 10 September)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [directory-upload] This should be part of whatwg/html (#15) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] Specify what HTMLInputElement::getFilesAndDirectories returns when the input type is not 'file' (#13) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Allow more explicit control over transaction lifetimes (#34) (Monday, 28 September)
• [spec-reviews] Indexed DB getAll(), openKeyCursor() and objectStoreNames (#84) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] FileSystem API and this draft conflict (#19) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [IndexedDB] Migrate feature requests from Wiki (#39) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Add locale-aware sorting (#38) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [encoding] Big5 encoder treats a code point as error when both an HKSCS and non-HKSCS pointer exists for the code point (#9) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Juan Anibal Micheli

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 29 September)

Juan Campa

• Re: [fetch] POST calls - Request Payload is not shown with native fetch (#59) (Saturday, 12 September)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] how does SoftUpdate "force bypass cache flag" get set? (#753) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] 24 hour spontaneous update doesn't seem specced (#514) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] 24 hour spontaneous update doesn't seem specced (#514) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] 24 hour spontaneous update doesn't seem specced (#514) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [ServiceWorker] WindowClient.navigate() for the same origin but off-scope clients (#752) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Typescript file and spec are not in sync (#750) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Typescript file and spec are not in sync (#750) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fix spelling error: arguement -> argument (#748) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] s/arguement/argument/g (#747) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Add xrefs to creation URL in HTML. (19de693) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Is fetchEvent.client a performance concern? (#723) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] 24 hour spontaneous update doesn't seem specced (#514) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] 24 hour spontaneous update doesn't seem specced (#514) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent is non cancelable yet checks canceled flag (#741) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent is non cancelable yet checks canceled flag (#741) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent is non cancelable yet checks canceled flag (#741) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Is fetchEvent.client a performance concern? (#723) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Use a new algorithm and hooks for importScripts(urls) called on a ServiceWorkerGlobalScope. (59e3745) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Kane York

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 5 September)

Kenji Baheux

• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Thursday, 10 September)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [manifest] Maintain list of sites that have a manifest (#404) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (#403) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (5101b33) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Saturday, 19 September)

Kevron Rees

• Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Monday, 21 September)

Kinna

• [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Kit Cambridge

• [push-api] Mark `PushMessageData` methods as throwable (#165) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [push-api] Message encryption (#130) (Monday, 14 September)

Koji Ishii

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Kornel

• Re: [fetch] Allow operation to outlive the document unloading (beacon) (#124) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Allow operation to outlive the document unloading (beacon) (#124) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [fetch] Allow operation to outlive the document unloading (beacon) (#124) (Thursday, 10 September)

Léonie Watson

• Re: [charter-html] Find formal resolutions of the group (#118) (Thursday, 10 September)

Marc G.

• Re: [fetch] Proposal: response.xml() (#16) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Proposal: response.xml() (#16) (Monday, 28 September)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [manifest] Maintain list of sites that have a manifest (#404) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [manifest] Support for platform hints on icons (#405) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [manifest] Support for platform hints on icons (#405) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [manifest] List expected permissions in the manifest. (#395) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [img-conversion] Encode and decode should take/produce streams (#15) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (#403) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (#403) (Saturday, 19 September)
• [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (#403) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#7) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be supports() (#12) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be "supports" (#12) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be "supports" (#12) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] canDecodeType \ canEncodeType could be "supports" (#12) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Editorial changes (#10) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] Explainer should explain how to use the API for common cases (#11) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] Editorial changes (#10) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] "The spec includes a section on some potential alternative solutions, including this one" (#9) (Friday, 11 September)
• [img-conversion] Examples from spec should be in explainer (#8) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Add explainer document (#7) (Thursday, 10 September)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

• [ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Typescript file and spec are not in sync (#750) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Start with trying to spec foreign fetch. (#749) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Fix spelling error: arguement -> argument (#748) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Worker-As-A-Service service workers (#744) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Worker-As-A-Service service workers (#744) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Monday, 14 September)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [fetch] Content-Length on HEAD (#135) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Unblocking the HTTPS Transitions (#74) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [fetch] Content-Length on HEAD (#135) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Create a "advice for spec authors" page (#78) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Unblocking the HTTPS Transitions (#74) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] 206/304 handling broken? (#97) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [spec-reviews] HTTP Opportunistic Security (#80) (Wednesday, 16 September)

Martin Thomson

• [push-api] Multiple consecutive messages (#168) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [push-api] Making checks in the makefile solid; fixing tidy shortcoming (#167) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [push-api] Rewriting push event handling; allowing data to be optional. (#166) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [push-api] Making pushsubscriptionchange event extendable; defining algorithm (#164) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [ServiceWorker] s/arguement/argument/g (#747) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [push-api] Message encryption (#130) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [permissions] request/revoke (#46) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [permissions] request/revoke (#46) (Friday, 11 September)
• [permissions] request/revoke (#46) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [permissions] Add screen sharing permissions (#45) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [push-api] Adding make check and circle CI support (#162) (Thursday, 3 September)

Masayuki Nakano

• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Michael van Ouwerkerk

• Re: [push-api] Making checks in the makefile solid; fixing tidy shortcoming (#167) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost event must inherit from ExtendableEvent (#65) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [push-api] Making pushsubscriptionchange event extendable; defining algorithm (#164) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [push-api] What push daily sending limit have GCM from single account? (#163) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [push-api] Adding make check and circle CI support (#162) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [push-api] Adding make check and circle CI support (#162) (Friday, 4 September)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: [fetch] Reference ABNF spec (#131) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [fetch] Reference ABNF spec (#131) (Thursday, 24 September)

miguelgarciaarribas

• Re: [push-api] What push daily sending limit have GCM from single account? (#163) (Tuesday, 8 September)

Mike West

• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Thursday, 3 September)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: [permissions] request/revoke (#46) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [permissions] request/revoke (#46) (Friday, 11 September)

Ms2ger

• Re: [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [dom] Attributes need case-insensitive matching on getting (#41) (Thursday, 24 September)

mwatson2

• Re: [spec-reviews] Write up the Secure Stop issue for ddorwin (#73) (Monday, 14 September)

Nikhil Marathe

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent is non cancelable yet checks canceled flag (#741) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [ServiceWorker] Should ServiceWorker.scriptURL have fragment removed? (#742) (Tuesday, 1 September)

ojan

• Re: [uievents] specify how compositionend works if the caret has been moved to a different element (#5) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [editing] change of event names beforeInput -> beforeEdit -> beforeInput? (#87) (Thursday, 3 September)

othermaciej

• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 29 September)

Owen Campbell-Moore

• [manifest] Support for platform hints on icons (#405) (Saturday, 26 September)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [touch-events] force property? (#30) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [touch-events] force property? (#30) (Monday, 28 September)

Patrick Walters

• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Saturday, 26 September)

Paul J. Boyes

• Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Friday, 18 September)
• [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Friday, 18 September)

Paul Kinlan

• Re: [manifest] Maintain list of sites that have a manifest (#404) (Saturday, 26 September)

Pedram Emrouznejad

• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Figure out a good replacement for /deep/ in testing scenarios (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Monday, 21 September)

Peter Jas

• Re: [directory-upload] Repository redirect or Organization redirect to MicrosoftEdge (#4) (Thursday, 24 September)

Peter Linss

• [spec-reviews] Performance API review (#83) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [spec-reviews] Feedback on Keygen (#82) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)

peterMelco

• Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Monday, 21 September)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [fullscreen] ::backdrop of root (#24) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [clipboard-apis] The ClipboardEvent constructor is strange (#10) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Attributes need case-insensitive matching on getting (#41) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#75) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#72) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#72) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [xhr] Resture the filename argument to FormData.append(name, blob) (#25) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [dom] Make createAttribute() lowercase the input in HTML documents (#72) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Compute sticky position? (#21) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose not to render ::backdrop if the corresponding element is not rendered (#20) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Philip Walton

• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Is there a custom pseudo-elements proposal or spec anywhere? (#298) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Is there a custom pseudo-elements proposal or spec anywhere? (#298) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] Add a custom pseudo-elements proposal (#299) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: [charter-html] Require CfC for group decisions (136bb1f) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Apple timed media comments (#129) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] WebVTT and Caption API from Timed Media (#119) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] WebVTT and Caption API from Timed Media (#119) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Find formal resolutions of the group (#118) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Apple timed media comments (#129) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Added RF and licensing statement in success criteria (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Removed webvtt (#127) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Removed webvtt (#127) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Moz comments (#125) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Added WebTV IG (#126) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Added WebTV IG (#126) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Moz comments (#125) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] David Singer's comments (#120) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Call it like it is (#107) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Call it like it is (#107) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Move some specs towards incubation. Canvas is maintenance. Added WICG. (#124) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Move some specs towards incubation. Canvas is maintenance. Added WICG. (#124) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Find formal resolutions of the group (#118) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Added WHATWG relatsionships (#121) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Apple comments (#123) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Apple comments (#123) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Apple comments (#123) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Comments from Josh Soref (#116) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Various minor edits (#122) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Comments from Josh Soref (#116) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Various minor edits (#122) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [charter-html] Added WHATWG relatsionships (#121) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [charter-html] DOM Parsing and Serialization now uses Github (#113) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Pointer Lock now uses Github (#114) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [charter-html] WebVTT and Caption API from Timed Media (#119) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [charter-html] Find formal resolutions of the group (#118) (Friday, 4 September)
• [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Friday, 4 September)

r12a

• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Monday, 21 September)

Rachael L Moore

• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Monday, 28 September)

reda

• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Friday, 11 September)

Reuben Morais

• Re: [IndexedDB] Add locale-aware sorting (#38) (Monday, 21 September)

Rick Byers

• Re: [touch-events] force property? (#30) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [touch-events] force property? (#30) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [touch-events] force property? (#30) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [dom] Clarify intro text on non-normative sections (#83) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions (#82) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [dom] Add EventListenerOptions (#82) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [touch-events] Not all touch events should be synchronous and uncancelable (#6) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [dom] Add EventListenerOptions (#82) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Should EventInit contain 'timestamp'? (#76) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Consider making `timestamp` a DOMHighResTimestamp (#80) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Consider making `timestamp` a DOMHighResTimestamp (#80) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [dom] Should EventInit contain 'timestamp'? (#76) (Monday, 21 September)
• [dom] Consider making `timestamp` a DOMHighResTimestamp (#80) (Monday, 21 September)
• [dom] Should EventInit contain 'timestamp'? (#76) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Missing spaces in rendered spec HTML (#65) (Friday, 4 September)
• [dom] Run latest bikeshed (#70) (Friday, 4 September)

Riff

• Re: [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Friday, 18 September)

Rune Lillesveen

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Tuesday, 8 September)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Fix syntax/typo (#61) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Proposal: Add namespace property to ElementRegistrationOptions parameter of Document.registerElement (#328) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow should fail on a slot element (#327) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Monday, 21 September)
• [webcomponents] attachShadow should fail on a slot element (#327) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Replace getDistributedNodes with getAssignedNodes (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Friday, 18 September)
• [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webcomponents] Rename Distributed Nodes Algorithm to Slot Assignment Algorithm (#323) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webcomponents] Rename getDistributedNodes() to getAssignedNodes() (#322) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webcomponents] Remove the constraint that slot can't have another slot as an ancestor (#321) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be of type HTMLSlotElement (#320) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] How the current model and the v1 model should interact? (#130) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Monday, 14 September)
• [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [selection-api] Selection events for text controls (#53) (Monday, 14 September)
• [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Node should expose their scope so that shared state can be scoped to components. (bugzilla: 22080) (#80) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] caretPositionFromPoint, elementFromPoint, and elementsFromPoint should respect shadow boundary (#313) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webcomponents] caretPositionFromPoint, elementFromPoint, and elementsFromPoint should respect shadow boundary (#313) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow on replaced elements (#312) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow on replaced elements (#312) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow on replaced elements (#312) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webcomponents] attachShadow must throw a TypeError when mode is omitted (#311) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The order of node trees is not well defined when one tree is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Enumerate the element names which don't support createShadowRoot(), instead of looking at the binding property (#110) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Interaction between CSS and composed tree needs to be better defined (#305) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Enumerate the element names which don't support createShadowRoot(), instead of looking at the binding property (#110) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Enumerate the element names which don't support createShadowRoot(), instead of looking at the binding property (#110) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Introduction section shouldn't refer to a Shadow DOM 101 article (#301) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Fix #307] Define "Assigned Slot" (ce3fe1c) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] The order of node trees is not well defined when one tree is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• [webcomponents] assignedSlot should be defined on Node (#310) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] attachShadow shouldn't have a fixed list of elements to throw (#309) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] "Assigned slot" is undefined (#307) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] The definitions of slot and slot elements are unclear (#306) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Interaction between CSS and composed tree needs to be better defined (#305) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] Interaction between CSS and composed tree needs to be better defined (#305) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] ownerDocument of a node in a shadow tree isn't well defined (#303) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] ownerDocument of a node in a shadow tree isn't well defined (#303) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] The order of tree of trees is not well defined when one node is not inside a shadow tree (#302) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• [webcomponents] Introduction section shouldn't refer to Shadow DOM 101 article (#301) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 1 September)

S.A.N

• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webcomponents] [Custom Elements] Import module (#329) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Friday, 4 September)
• [fetch] Reconnect and Retry-After (#116) (Friday, 4 September)

Sam Ruby

• Re: [charter-html] Indicate relationship with the WHATWG (#112) (Monday, 21 September)

Sebastian Mayr

• [dom] removeEventListener doesn't handle currently dispatching events (#84) (Sunday, 27 September)

Shahar Or

• [editing] The web doesn't need another badly implemented API (#88) (Tuesday, 8 September)

Simon Pieters

• [fetch] Fix typo conneciton -> connection (#133) (Monday, 28 September)

sleevi

• Re: [fetch] Introduce "connection pool" and a concept of a "connection" (#114) (Saturday, 26 September)

Steve Orvell

• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Use Boilerplate: omit feedback-header to remove redundant GitHub link (#74) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [uievents] dfn cleanup (9283fab) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] dfn cleanup (9283fab) (Friday, 4 September)
• [uievents] Please mark some definitions as not exported (#6) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [dom] Missing spaces in rendered spec HTML (#65) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Takayoshi Kochi

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)

Takeshi Yoshino

• Re: [xhr] Creating an ArrayBuffer can fail (#26) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [streams] Port precise flow control to writable streams (#318) (Thursday, 17 September)

teoli2003

• [selection-api] Event handlers missing (#60) (Sunday, 27 September)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 15 September)

TJ VanToll

• Re: [fetch] Option to require response.ok (#103) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Travis Leithead

• Re: [spec-reviews] Feedback on Keygen (#82) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Proposal: Add namespace property to ElementRegistrationOptions parameter of Document.registerElement (#328) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [directory-upload] This should be part of whatwg/html (#15) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider making ShadowRoot directly inherit from Node (#325) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Consider adding a new node type for ShadowRoot (#324) (Monday, 21 September)
• [spec-reviews] General review of Shadow DOM 2015 updates (#79) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] slot element's fallback contents is never used (#317) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] requestIdleCallback (#70) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS font-display (#71) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Fixed typos (#46) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Fixed typos (#46) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Start File URI feedback (#65) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] Clarify whether the empty string is a valid slot name or not (#319) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [dom] Consider banning insertNode() of the Range's start node (#63) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Node should expose their scope so that shared state can be scoped to components. (bugzilla: 22080) (#80) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] dfn cleanup (9283fab) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] Remove "(formerly DOM Level 3 Events)" from the title? (#1) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] Remove "(formerly DOM Level 3 Events)" from the title? (#1) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] Please mark some definitions as not exported (#6) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] Please mark some definitions as not exported (#6) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [uievents] Travisleithead dfncleanup (#7) (Friday, 4 September)
• [uievents] Travisleithead dfncleanup (#7) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Friday, 4 September)
• [dom] Factor getElementsBy* into ParentNode or NonElementParentNode? (#68) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] Need equivalent of ownerDocument for Elements in a shadow tree to get to their ShadowRoot (#315) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] Section 2.4 - CSS inherit by default? (#314) (Thursday, 3 September)

Tsuyoshi Horo

• Re: [ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Wednesday, 16 September)

Varunkumar Nagarajan

• Re: [webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Wayne Carr

• Re: [charter-html] Find formal resolutions of the group (#118) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117) (Saturday, 5 September)

Wenbo Zhu

• Re: [streams] Add an example of piping to a writable stream for consuming a readable stream (#393) (Thursday, 10 September)

wizzwizz4

• Re: [manifest] Maintain list of sites that have a manifest (#404) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (#403) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [manifest] Remove feature at risk for theme_color (closes #356) (5101b33) (Wednesday, 23 September)

Xabier Rodríguez

• [streams] Removed reduntant test for negative strategy.highWaterMark (#395) (Friday, 18 September)
• [streams] Fixed test about cancelling a released reader, promise should reject. (#394) (Friday, 18 September)

Xidorn Quan

• Re: [fullscreen] ::backdrop of root (#24) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [fullscreen] ::backdrop of root (#24) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fullscreen] Fullscreen on non-HTML elements? (#22) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fullscreen] Compute sticky position? (#21) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fullscreen] Propose not to render ::backdrop if the corresponding element is not rendered (#20) (Friday, 4 September)
• [fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Friday, 4 September)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [img-conversion] Convert to spec (#14) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: [fetch] force-Origin-header flag set for no-cors requests (#91) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• [fetch] Introduce Response.body. (#118) (#128) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [streams] Add IsReadableStreamDisturbed predicate (#385) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [streams] Add IsReadableStreamDisturbed predicate (#385) (Friday, 11 September)
• [fetch] Add a missing quote. (#123) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [fetch] Fix "nosniff?" link in order to avoid anolis bug. (#122) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [fetch] Add description for suspension, resuming and garbage collection. (#121) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [streams] Add IsReadableStreamDisturbed predicate (#385) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fetch] Add "Streams" section. (#119) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fetch] Add Response.body (#118) (Monday, 7 September)
• [fetch] Fix quotation of "error" response type. (#117) (Monday, 7 September)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [selection-api] Draft WD for publication in October 2015 (#62) (Tuesday, 29 September)

Zibi Braniecki

• Re: [dom] Read-only OS time formatting preferences (#79) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [dom] Read-only OS time formatting preferences (#79) (Monday, 21 September)
• [dom] Read-only OS time formatting preferences (#79) (Monday, 21 September)
• [dom] MutationObserver callbacks should be called before executing defer scritps (#78) (Friday, 18 September)
• [dom] MutationObserver with querySelector for elements (#77) (Friday, 18 September)

Zoltan Kis

• [permissions] Add "nfc" to enum PermissionName (#47) (Tuesday, 15 September)

⭐caitp⭐

• Re: [xhr] Make setRequestHeader() normalize header values just like Fetch does and update HTTP references. Fixes https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 (90c79d0) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [xhr] Make setRequestHeader() normalize header values just like Fetch does and update HTTP references. Fixes https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 (90c79d0) (Friday, 18 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2015 23:45:28 UTC