- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 10:55:41 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2015 17:56:31 UTC
Section 2.4 defines composed tree but its purpose and use isn't clarified in the section. Also the following text > Unless an element is in a document composed tree, the element must not appear in the formatting structure [CSS21] nor create any CSS box. refers to "formatting structure" but this is a concept defined in a non-normative section of [CSS2.1](http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2). I think, we want to define the composed tree as the [document tree](https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/conform.html#doctree) in CSS instead. Otherwise definitions os sibling, ancestor, etc... in the CSS world wouldn't make sense. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/305
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2015 17:56:31 UTC