- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:25:30 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 18:25:57 UTC
It seems like the latest spec doesn't define when the fallback contents of a `slot` element is used. Since the [CSS Scoping Module Level 1](http://www.w3.org/TR/css-scoping-1/) refers to the concepts of [distribution list](http://www.w3.org/TR/css-scoping-1/#distribution-list) and [insertion point](http://www.w3.org/TR/css-scoping-1/#insertion-point) (this should be renamed to slot), we should probably define that either a `slot` element without any distributed nodes doesn't constitute a `insertion point` (a.k.a. slot). We could alternatively define that an insertion point can have an empty distribution list, and then make the CSS Scoping Module define the fallback behavior but that seems cumbersome. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/317
Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 18:25:57 UTC