Re: [spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66)

Some comments:

It seems like it should say more explicitly that it works like the 'transform' property (which I think is the intent).  For example, having 'motion-path' should have the effects that 'transform' has like creating a stacking context, being a containing block for absolute and fixed positioned elements, etc.

It also seems like the spec should have some examples with code in them.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/66#issuecomment-140507515

Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 19:22:39 UTC