Re: [charter-html] Using CfC for Decisions (#117)

> On Sep 20, 2015, at 4:34 , Arthur Barstow <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> David - for several years, WebApps has been using CfCs to record formal decisions as documented in the group's Work Mode document. HTMLWG adopted many parts of WebApps' work mode including CfCs and my expectation is the combined group will continue to follow that practice.

Maybe we’re aligned.  For several years, HTML has announced formal calls for consensus using an email with CfC in the title, and the subject of the consensus. That’s all I am asking for; a continuation of the HTML WG’s practice.

What I don’t want to have happen is the chairs being accused of claiming consensus when the attempt to establish consensus wasn’t very visible. That gets messy.

> 
> I prefer the charter to not be overly prescriptive regarding the operational aspects of the group. However, I don't see any particular harm with adding a link to the group's "work mode" document (as is done now in WebApps' charter).
> 
> @plehegar please create the group's home page now (f.ex. github.com/WebPlaformWG) so we can start populating with documents and proposals for things like the group's work mode. (Issue 99).
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.



---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/117#issuecomment-142038797