Re: [img-conversion] toBlob() Having two optional kinda sucks... let's merge them. (#13)

I am not really familiar with the upcoming streams API, but it sounds like a good idea. I'm wondering if there's much performance benefit though, since image encoding/decoding is typically pretty fast (on the order of 100ms). So in your upload example it seems just as practical to wait for doThing() to complete in its entirety before uploading, since the network part would probably take orders of magnitude longer. Perhaps streams could wait for a v2 spec?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/img-conversion/issues/13#issuecomment-142752416