public-web-plugins@w3.org from September 2003 by author

Alastair

Re: Scope of the patent (Saturday, 13 September)

Alex Rivero

Re: What would it take? (Tuesday, 16 September)
prior art and obvious. (Tuesday, 2 September)
Royalty-Free for GPLed-softw? (Monday, 1 September)

Andrew Arme

Plugin + embedded object (Saturday, 20 September)
Prior art via scripts? (Thursday, 18 September)

Aral Balkan

RE: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
RE: a what if... (Thursday, 4 September)

Axel H Horns

Patent family of US0005838906A - regional aspects (Friday, 5 September)

Benjamin Franz

RE: What a prior art product must do (Tuesday, 30 September)
Cross patent just issued to James Gosling? (Tuesday, 16 September)
Re: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] (Wednesday, 10 September)
Re: Will this verdict effect java? (Monday, 8 September)
RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)

Chris 'Xenon' Hanson

What would it take? (Monday, 15 September)

Christopher Barber

Re: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)

christopher.jauregui@syngenta.com

RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Thursday, 18 September)
RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)

D Goneit

Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
Re: Surprised (Friday, 5 September)
Surprised (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)

Daniel_Austin@grainger.com

Re: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)

Dean Jackson

Re: alternatives and migration scenarios (Thursday, 4 September)

Driekus de Lange

Will this verdict effect java? (Monday, 8 September)

Eike Pierstorff

AW: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Monday, 15 September)
AW: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)

Frans

Re: a what if... (Thursday, 4 September)

Frans Meijer

Re: a what if... (Tuesday, 9 September)

Gil Hauer

RE: NeWS as prior art? (Monday, 1 September)
NeWS as prior art? (Monday, 1 September)

Glenn Randers-Pehrson

RE: What a prior art product must do (Tuesday, 30 September)
Re: What a prior art product must do (Tuesday, 30 September)

Hector Santos

Re: Cross patent just issued to James Gosling? (Tuesday, 16 September)
Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Monday, 15 September)
Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Friday, 12 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: Here's some libellous drivel for you (no holds barred) (Monday, 8 September)
More Prior Art - BBS Systems and FrontEnds (Friday, 5 September)
Re: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
Re: Judge's ruling on the early history of Eolas vs. Viola (try #2) (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: a what if... (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD (Tuesday, 2 September)
Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD (Tuesday, 2 September)
More Prior Art - Smoking gun? RFC 965 "A Format for a Graphical Communication Protocol" Dec/1985 (Tuesday, 2 September)
More Prior art - Early VideoTex industry (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: 906 (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: HTML frames and the Eolas '906 patent (Monday, 1 September)
Re: MS-EOLAS story .. (Monday, 1 September)
More prior art - Document Storage Business (Monday, 1 September)

Hemant Desai

Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... (Tuesday, 2 September)
906 (Tuesday, 2 September)
MS-EOLAS story .. (Monday, 1 September)

Jake Robb

Re: Scope of the patent (Monday, 15 September)
Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Monday, 15 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Friday, 12 September)
Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) (Friday, 12 September)
Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) (Friday, 12 September)
Re: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
Re: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
Re: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)

Jason Cunliffe

Re: What a prior art product must do (Wednesday, 1 October)
Re: What a prior art product must do (Tuesday, 30 September)

Jeff Stevens

CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)

Jeffrey Altman

CHIP was Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) (Friday, 12 September)
Re: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] (Wednesday, 10 September)
[Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] (Wednesday, 10 September)

Jerry Mead

The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed (Thursday, 25 September)
Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Monday, 15 September)
Slashdot (Sunday, 14 September)
Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
Further thoughts on the Eolas patent coverage (Friday, 12 September)
Re: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
Re: Surprised (Friday, 5 September)
More speculative comment (Monday, 1 September)
Re: IE Thread (Monday, 1 September)

jim@idexer.com

RE: What a prior art product must do (Wednesday, 1 October)
Clearification of my Sept 25 Post (Wednesday, 1 October)
Re: What a prior art product must do (Tuesday, 30 September)
Modern Browsers May NOT Infringe Eola After All (Thursday, 25 September)

Kade.Hansson@dpiwe.tas.gov.au

Here's some libellous drivel for you (no holds barred) (Monday, 8 September)
Re: IE Thread (Tuesday, 2 September)

Karl Dubost

Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes (Monday, 22 September)

Khan, Mahtab

RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)

Kimberly J. Blessing

Re: Background information on Mr. Wei Pei (Monday, 1 September)

Michael Condouris

Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
RE: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
Re: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
a what if... (Thursday, 4 September)
alternatives and migration scenarios (Thursday, 4 September)

Mike

RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Thursday, 18 September)
Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Wednesday, 17 September)

Mike Leach (Cubic Compass)

Eolas says it would settle over IE (Saturday, 20 September)

Neil Munro

RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Thursday, 18 September)
RE: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] (Wednesday, 10 September)
RE: Here's some libellous drivel for you (no holds barred) (Monday, 8 September)
Separate programs (Saturday, 6 September)

neo binedell

RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)

Nicolas Costes

Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
Re: a what if... (Monday, 8 September)

Orlando Echevarria

Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft (Monday, 1 September)

Philipp Hoschka

Re: The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed (Sunday, 28 September)
Re: The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed (Thursday, 25 September)

Reza Roboubi

Re: Scope of the patent (Saturday, 13 September)
Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Thursday, 11 September)
Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
Re: Separate programs (Saturday, 6 September)
Business Model vs. Software Patent (Saturday, 6 September)
Which patent sub-sections can stand alone? (Saturday, 6 September)
Re: What a prior art product must do (Saturday, 6 September)

Richard M. Smith

RE: What a prior art product must do (Wednesday, 1 October)
RE: What a prior art product must do (Tuesday, 30 September)
A federal judge has dismissed a patent infringement case against Microsoft (Thursday, 25 September)
Two new CNET articles on the Eolas '906 patent (Thursday, 25 September)
More plugin patent woes (Saturday, 20 September)
Eolas says it would settle over IE (Saturday, 20 September)
Eolas suit may spark HTML changes (Saturday, 20 September)
Setback for Microsoft Ripples Through the World Wide Web (Wednesday, 17 September)
RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Saturday, 13 September)
RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
RE: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
RE: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] (Wednesday, 10 September)
RE: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
RE: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Wednesday, 10 September)
RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Monday, 8 September)
Judge's ruling on the early history of Eolas vs. Viola (try #2) (Thursday, 4 September)
Judge's ruling on the early history of Eolas vs. Viola (Thursday, 4 September)
RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)
Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Wednesday, 3 September)
RE: Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD (Tuesday, 2 September)
RE: prior art and obvious. (Tuesday, 2 September)
RE: Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD (Tuesday, 2 September)
RE: Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... (Tuesday, 2 September)
The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder (Tuesday, 2 September)
RE: More speculative comment (Monday, 1 September)
RE: NeWS as prior art? (Monday, 1 September)
HTML frames and the Eolas '906 patent (Monday, 1 September)
JavaScript and the Eolas '906 patent (Monday, 1 September)

Richard S. Hendershot

RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Friday, 12 September)

Robin Berjon

Re: alternatives and migration scenarios (Thursday, 4 September)

Russell Cowdrey

RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Tuesday, 9 September)
If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue (Monday, 8 September)

Scott Ahten

Re: What a prior art product must do (Wednesday, 3 September)

Scott Cadillac

RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Wednesday, 17 September)
RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? (Thursday, 11 September)
RE: Surprised (Friday, 5 September)
RE: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
RE: a what if... (Friday, 5 September)
RE: 906 (Wednesday, 3 September)
RE: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder (Tuesday, 2 September)
RE: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder (Tuesday, 2 September)

SerpentMage (Christian Gross)

Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) (Friday, 12 September)
Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) (Friday, 12 September)
Re: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)

Seth Johnson

Actually, the SW Patents Battle is Heating up *Right Now* (was Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue) (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder (Tuesday, 2 September)

Steve Brimley

RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes (Monday, 15 September)
RE: Scope of the patent (Monday, 15 September)
Scope of the patent (Friday, 12 September)

Steven Pemberton

Re: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)

Stolowitz, Micah

RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? (Thursday, 4 September)
RE: Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... (Tuesday, 2 September)

Sturm, Thomas

RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Thursday, 18 September)
RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? (Wednesday, 17 September)
Timeline? (Friday, 12 September)

Thomas Chiverton

Re: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrappe r estoppel] (Thursday, 11 September)
Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) (Thursday, 11 September)

tom poe

Re: Setback for Microsoft Ripples Through the World Wide Web (Wednesday, 17 September)
Re: Surprised (Friday, 5 September)

Wiswell, Virginia

RE: The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed (Thursday, 25 September)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 22:49:26 UTC