prior art and obvious.

• From: Alex Rivero <arivero@unizar.es>
• Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:45:57 +0200
• To: "web-plugins" <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <200309021845.23744.arivero@unizar.es>

  I believe most of the things we are speaking about are not
straight prior art, but they can -should- be used to claim
obviousness. As far as I understand, if it can be showed,
based on prior inventions, that the patent claims are
obvious for any engineer, then the patent is invalid.
Is this the plan?

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 12:46:10 UTC