- From: Jake Robb <jakerobb@mac.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 17:11:28 -0400
- To: W3C Public Web Plugins List <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
Lucky for us, it should take him a pretty long time to count half a billion dollars... Hector Santos wrote: > > Yup, Mr. Doyle is certainly counting his chickens..... > > Sincerely, > > Hector Santos, CTO > Santronics Software, Inc. > http://www.santronics.com > 305-431-2846 Cell > 305-248-3204 Office > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Condouris" <priority_one@amberdigital.com> > To: "neo binedell" <neoji@mweb.co.za> > Cc: "'W3C Public Web Plugins List'" <public-web-plugins@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:10 PM > Subject: RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue > > >> >> If this patent covers that, it may as well cover the cotton gin. I >> can't see how that even comes close to their admittedly broad sketch of >> what a plug-in is. On the other hand, they do seem to be quite ballsy. >> >> On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 16:48, neo binedell wrote: >>> So what is the concensus when one opens a >>> flash swf document directly from the server >>> (i.e. not embedded inside a web page)? >>> >>> There are no html tags or html documents for >>> that matter? >>> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> ::: Quantum materiae materietur >>> ::: marmota monax si marmota >>> ::: monax materiam possit materiari? >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> >>>> Jake, >>> >>>> That's my impression also about the '906 patent. The nut of the patent >>>> is that a plugin is run inside of a Web page (AKA, hypermedia document) >>>> and it has its own dedicated area of the Web page to show output and >>>> interact with a user. >>> >>>> Richard >> -- >> Michael Condouris >> http://www.amberdigital.com >> Telephone: 973-857-7707 >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 17:11:33 UTC