- From: Jerry Mead <jerrym@meadroid.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 10:15:46 +0100
- To: "W3C Public Web Plugins List" <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
On Sunday 31 August Ed Millard wrote ++++++++++++++ I'm curious, if Microsoft links the .NET VM into the next version of IE and runs it as an IE thread do they stop infringing the patent? If so I imagine they may actually be quite happy about this ruling, behind closed doors, and perhaps they aren't trying very hard to find prior art to overturn the patent. If browser plugins are outlawed it does substantially more harm to Microsoft's competitors than it does to Microsoft as long as Microsoft builds the dominant browser. ++++++++++++++ It's probably worth remembering that Microsoft have let it be known that IE6.0 SP1 will be the last 'standalone' version of IE for 'legacy' (i.e. pre-Longhorn) Windows platforms. It's almost certain that 'browsing' in Longhorn will be effectively 'built-in' to the OS and will be written in managed code. With a release date of 2005+ for Longhorn, the company has plenty of time to address non-infringement in their new code base, given that any appeal fails. That leaves the current base of IE and WebBrowser to consider, and it's quite hard to know what could or would need to be done without a more clear understanding of the scope of the Eolas claim. Support for Netscape-compatible plug-ins has already been removed from the latest builds of IE. Deprecating support for the <object> tag is a further possibility, but all that would mean is that the corporates who depend on it wouldn't update to the neutered builds ... and it's possible that not even Microsoft would be prepared to risk the row that would ensue over thousands of broken corporate applications were that 'fix' to be incorporated and pushed out alongside some new critical MSHTML security patch. But as others have noted, until we see a technical FAQ (and preferably a transcript of the recent meeting) from the W3C to base any comments upon, most of what can be contributed here is just going to be speculative and probably not very helpful. Jerry Mead http://www.meadroid.com/
Received on Monday, 1 September 2003 05:27:49 UTC