Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes

Hi Steve

Thanks for your mail, but it's Ray Ozzie you want, not me. All I did was
point at Ray's blog entry:

http://www.ozzie.net/blog/stories/2003/09/12/savingTheBrowser.html

Jerry Mead
http://www.meadroid.com/


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Brimley" <steve.brimley@toplev.com>
To: "'Jerry Mead'" <jerrym@meadroid.com>
Cc: "'W3C: Public Web Plugins List'" <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes


>
> Dear Jerry
>
> I read your article on the work done in Lotus notes.
>
> I'm not sure, but it seems to me that the patent refers explicitly to
> objects that occupy a display area within the containing hypermedia
> document.  What the application seems to have in mind is interactively
> controllable objects that will appear as an integral part of the
document -
> moving and scrolling with the document as necessary.
>
> Here is (part of) the text of the application:
> >>>>>>>
> to automatically invoke said executable application to execute on said
> client workstation in order to display said object and enable interactive
> processing of said object within a display area created at said first
> location within the portion of said first distributed hypermedia document
> being displayed in said first browser-controlled window
> <<<<<<
>
> As far as I could see from your illustrations, the Lotus Notes
> implementation did not include this refinement.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry Mead [mailto:jerrym@meadroid.com]
> Sent: 13 September 2003 07:38
> To: public-web-plugins@w3.org
> Subject: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes
>
>
>
> http://www.ozzie.net/blog/stories/2003/09/12/savingTheBrowser.html
>
> Jerry Mead
> http://www.meadroid.com/
>
>

Received on Monday, 15 September 2003 07:26:30 UTC