- From: Sturm, Thomas <TSturm@modemmedia.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:44:18 -0700
- To: "'public-web-plugins@w3.org'" <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <216ED4827714D311BF2300508B090E2203C11410@smtp05.caus.modempoppe.com>
quote: > From a Designer/Programmer point of view, replacing <OBJECT> with some > dynamic <IFRAME> mechanism is the probably the excellent perspective for > implementing a work-around. > > True, doing this on the server side could be an elegant fix for simple flash objects in existing pages, but it won't do any good if the original page had any kind of Flash - JavaScript interaction. I can think of several instances where we had JavaScript talk to Flash or vice versa and these interactions would break in such a scenario. The only option that I have heard of from the original MS presentation in San Francisco that would not break the DOM in some way is to prompt the user before Flash is being executed. If all it takes is a user prompt to avoid a patent conflict, the object would still exist as usual in the page for JavaScript to talk to. But this is of course all guesswork without more data. It would be very nice if we could get any more information about these mysterious "options" that MS presented to Macromedia et al. Is anybody from the W3C listening in on this mailing list or are we here just stumbling around in the fog? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------- Thomas Sturm Senior User Interface Developer Modem Media 111 Sutter Street San Francisco, CA 94104 415-733-8429
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 16:44:42 UTC