Benjamin Adrian
Dan Brickley
Felix Sasaki
Gregg Kellogg
Henry Story
Ivan Herman
- Re: Telecon Agenda - July 29th 2010, 1400 UTC (Thursday, 29 July)
- Implementation also works: Re 2: Updated RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa for review (Tuesday, 27 July)
- Re: Updated RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa for review (Tuesday, 27 July)
- Core heart-beat publishing and public comments (Monday, 26 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36: Specifying a default vocabulary via an RDFa Profile (Monday, 26 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36: Specifying a default vocabulary via an RDFa Profile (Sunday, 25 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Sunday, 25 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Saturday, 24 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36: Specifying a default vocabulary via an RDFa Profile (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Thursday, 22 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: We don't need any RDFS vocabulary for error triples! (Thursday, 22 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: We don't need any RDFS vocabulary for error triples! (Wednesday, 21 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 21 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: We don't need any RDFS vocabulary for error triples! (Wednesday, 21 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 17 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (Saturday, 17 July)
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST ignore @version (Thursday, 15 July)
- Re: XHTML Basic + RDFa (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- XHTML Basic + RDFa (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: Duplicates in @prefix (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-3 PROPOSAL: Infoset coercion (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-3 PROPOSAL: Infoset coercion (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-15 PROPOSAL: @version attribute in HTML5 (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Thursday, 8 July)
- Fwd: changed FR and UK dial-in numbers for teleconferences (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: Annotating our specs with RDF... (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: On ISSUE-26 : RDFa Error vocabulary (Friday, 2 July)
- Re: On ISSUE-26 : RDFa Error vocabulary (Thursday, 1 July)
Kingsley Idehen
Knud Hinnerk Möller
Manu Sporny
- Re: ISSUE-36: Notice of RDFa Profiles allowing rdfa:vocabulary predicate (Thursday, 29 July)
- ISSUE-36: Notice of RDFa Profiles allowing rdfa:vocabulary predicate (Thursday, 29 July)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-07-29 (Thursday, 29 July)
- Telecon Agenda - July 29th 2010, 1400 UTC (Monday, 26 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-07-22 (Thursday, 22 July)
- Telecon Agenda - July 22nd 2010, 1400 UTC (Monday, 19 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (Friday, 16 July)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-07-15 (Thursday, 15 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Telecon Agenda - July 15th 2010, 1400 UTC (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 12 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 12 July)
- WebID pre-alpha specification (uses RDFa) (Sunday, 11 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: ISSUE-3 PROPOSAL: Infoset coercion (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: ISSUE-3 PROPOSAL: Infoset coercion (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: ISSUE-15 PROPOSAL: @version attribute in HTML5 (Friday, 9 July)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-07-08 (Thursday, 8 July)
- ISSUE-24 discussion (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-3 PROPOSAL: Infoset coercion (Thursday, 8 July)
- ISSUE-3 PROPOSAL: Infoset coercion (Thursday, 8 July)
- ISSUE-15 PROPOSAL: @version attribute in HTML5 (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Wednesday, 7 July)
- ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 5 July)
- Telecon Agenda - July 8th 2010, 1400 UTC (Monday, 5 July)
- RDFa WG issues updated (Monday, 5 July)
- Re: RDFa API FPWD published (Monday, 5 July)
- Re: WD-rdfa-in-html-20100624 DTD related issues (Monday, 5 July)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-07-01 (Thursday, 1 July)
Mark Birbeck
- Re: ISSUE-26: We don't need any RDFS vocabulary for error triples! (Wednesday, 21 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 17 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 16 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 16 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Saturday, 10 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: On ISSUE-26 : RDFa Error vocabulary (Thursday, 1 July)
- Re: On ISSUE-26 : RDFa Error vocabulary (Thursday, 1 July)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - July 1st 2010, 1400 UTC (Thursday, 1 July)
Markus Gylling
Martin McEvoy
RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
Reto Bachmann-Gmür
robert_weir@us.ibm.com
Shane McCarron
- Updated drafts for publication (Thursday, 29 July)
- XHTML M12N publication is imminent (Monday, 26 July)
- Updated RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa for review (Monday, 26 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36: Specifying a default vocabulary via an RDFa Profile (Sunday, 25 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Friday, 23 July)
- Re: RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Thursday, 22 July)
- RDFa Profiles, terms, and predicates (oh my!) (Thursday, 22 July)
- ISSUE-36: Specifying a default vocabulary via an RDFa Profile (Thursday, 22 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Thursday, 22 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 21 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Tuesday, 20 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 16 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (Friday, 16 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (Friday, 16 July)
- PF Working Group and RDFa (Thursday, 15 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Thursday, 15 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: XHTML Basic + RDFa (Wednesday, 14 July)
- ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 12 July)
- Re: Feedback on RDFa Core 1.1 (Sunday, 11 July)
- Re: Feedback on RDFa Core 1.1 (Saturday, 10 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Saturday, 10 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Saturday, 10 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Saturday, 10 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Tuesday, 6 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 5 July)
- Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 5 July)
- Annotating our specs with RDF... (Sunday, 4 July)
- Re: On ISSUE-26 : RDFa Error vocabulary (Thursday, 1 July)
Stéphane Corlosquet
Toby Inkster
- Re: ISSUE-36: Specifying a default vocabulary via an RDFa Profile (Thursday, 22 July)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - July 22nd 2010, 1400 UTC (Thursday, 22 July)
- Re: ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (Friday, 16 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- SHOULD vs MUST ignore @version (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary (Wednesday, 14 July)
- Re: [foaf-protocols] WebID pre-alpha specification (uses RDFa) (Monday, 12 July)
- Re: WebID pre-alpha specification (uses RDFa) (Monday, 12 July)
- Re: Not waiting on browser manufacturers for RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 9 July)
- Re: ISSUE-24 discussion (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-15 PROPOSAL: @version attribute in HTML5 (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Thursday, 8 July)
- Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - July 8th 2010, 1400 UTC (Wednesday, 7 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Tuesday, 6 July)
- Re: Updating RDFa Core (Monday, 5 July)
Last message date: Thursday, 29 July 2010 17:46:53 UTC