- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:30:06 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTilFTt6gx_i9GS9YbJEgxj0NXeI7j1swxqYP10iU@mail.gmail.com>
2010/7/14 Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> > That's not really what I meant. More that the polyglot document is > incomplete w.r.t. attribute values. It oversimplifies the case. I am sure > that it will get sorted out in due course. However, with regard to TERMs > from a specific vocabulary - that is, values of @rel, @rev, and some other > attributes and that match the production NCName, we are committed to > ensuring that the requirements of RDFa and HTML5 are consistent with one > another. > > At least, that's my belief right now. The Working Group could come up with > some other approach as well. > Understand, thanks for the explanation. Felix > > > On 7/14/2010 10:07 AM, Felix Sasaki wrote: > > > > 2010/7/14 Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> > > I believe this definition is consistent with that one for values without > colons (non-CURIEs, or TERMs in RDFa Core 1.1). For values with colons, we > disagree that values of rel are always lower case since mixed case is > essential for supporting our use cases, as well as supporting other uses. > > > > So polyglot markup is not meant to be relevant for the CURIE use case? Just > trying to understand. > > Felix > > > > > > > On 7/14/2010 9:50 AM, Felix Sasaki wrote: > > Sorry for lurcking, a clarification question ... > > 2010/7/14 Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:01:52 -0500 > Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > > In XHTML+RDFa 1.1 we should say: > > > > When referencing TERMs in the vocabulary at > > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab, TERMs must be mapped to lower > > case. > > Does this also cover the case of the empty prefix? According to my > reading of XHTML+RDFa 1.0, given the following: > > rel="Next" > rel=":Next" > > The first is mapped to lower-case; the second is treated > case-sensitively. This is because the former is a term and the latter > is a CURIE. > > > > At http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html-polyglot-20100624/#attribute-values , > values of "rel" are described as always lower case. How does that (does it > at all?) relate to what you describe above? > > > Thanks for the clarification in advance, > > Felix > > > > > I suggest we retain this distinction, as there do exist mixed-case > terms defined in the XHTML vocabulary (though they're not used by RDFa > currently). > > Ivan wrote: > > > 2. in RDFa+XHTML (and I presume in RDFa+HTML5) there is a a default > > @vocab, namely http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# and, if this is the > > one in effect, then terms are interpreted in a case insensitive way, > > ie, terms must be mapped on lower case. > > Personally I'd ditch that too -- you get too many junk results. Better > to say that the default vocabulary in (X)HTML+RDFa is null. > > Otherwise you'll end up with having to deal with rel values from > Microformats, etc. The problem with that it that Microformats have > their own ways of determining what the "subject" is for a rel; applying > RDF's @about/@src/chaining rules doesn't work well. > > To handle the case of rel="next", rel="prev", etc define a default > *profile* for XHTML+RDFa, and have that profile define those terms > case-insensitively. (The profile SHOULD be hard-coded in XHTML+RDFa > parsers; authors MAY include an explicit @profile attribute referencing > the default profile.) > > This means that parsers need to internally allow profiles to define > both case-sensitive and case-insensitive terms, though we may decide > not that profiles other than the XHTML vocab are not privileged to > declare case-insensitive terms. > > This solution allows us to pick up "our" @rel terms but skim safely > over the @rel terms used by Microformats, Javascript libraries, etc. > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > > > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:30:42 UTC