Implementation also works: Re 2: Updated RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa for review

Just as an info: I have refreshed

http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/Shadow.html

and the underlying code; it implements the level described in the document. Ie, it is all doable...

B.t.w., we had discussions on the usage of @version; I have to retract the argument of the time. It is indeed easy to control whether the parser is 1.0 or 1.1 specific, the differences are minor (which is the way it should be). My code ignores the RDFa1.0 branch, though, because this is what we agreed upon

Ivan



On Jul 26, 2010, at 18:28 , Shane McCarron wrote:

> Manu would like us to push a heartbeat working draft after the meeting on Thursday.  I have put up dated editors drafts.  Please take a look at them and see if there is anything in them you would object to going out in a heartbeat draft.  We will be voting on a resolution to publish during the meeting Thursday.
> 
> As always, the updated drafts are linked to our drafts page at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf