- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:09:39 -0500
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I don't disagree Toby... but are there other RDF serializations that define the processor conformance for their serialization? And if so... how do THEY handle exceptions? If not... we are breaking new ground here. Do you have an alternative plan for dealing with errors during processing? On 7/7/2010 11:06 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:35:27 -0400 > Manu Sporny<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > >> -1 to the EARL-based mechanism. >> +1 to the simpler, RDFa-specific vocabulary. >> > -1 to both. > > No other RDF serialisation does anything like this. > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 16:10:39 UTC