Re: Feedback on RDFa Core 1.1

I apologize.  I know I integrated your feedback but I must not have checked it in!  I will fix these ASAP. 

"Stéphane Corlosquet" <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote:

>I'm not sure these comments have been addressed yet in the latest Editor's
>Draft [1]. I've attached a patch against Overview-src.html [2] if that
>helps.
>
>Steph.
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2010/ED-rdfa-core-20100705/
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html
>
>On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet
><scorlosquet@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is feedback on the RDFa 1.1 core W3C Working Draft 22 April 2010
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20100422/
>>
>> [[[
>> biblio:         http://example.org/biblio/0.1
>> ]]]
>> any reason for not using an existing biblio ontology such a bibo:
>> @prefix bibo: <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/> .
>> and further bibo:Book which is an existing class?
>>
>> [[[
>>    '<span about="urn:ISBN:0091808189" typeof="biblio:book"
>> ]]]
>> how about using some common practice and capitalize RDF classes, e.g.
>> biblio:Book?
>>
>> [[[
>>  prefix="biblio: http://example.org/
>> ]]]
>> why not being consistent and reuse the same namespace defined earlier?
>>
>> [[[
>> The general syntax of a CURIE can be summarised as follows:
>> ]]]
>> s/summarised/summarized (or do W3C documents use British spelling?)
>>
>> [[[
>> For example, the full URI for Albert Einstein on DPPedia is:
>> ]]]
>> s/DPPedia/DBPedia
>>
>> [[[
>> <#bbq> cal:dtastart "2015-09-16T16:00:00-05:00"^^xsd:dateTime .
>> ]]]
>> s/cal:dtastart/cal:dtstart
>>
>> [[[
>>  <span property="foaf:givenname">Albert</span>
>> foaf:givenName
>> same for _:a foaf:givenname "Albert" .
>> ]]]
>> s/foaf:givenname/foaf:givenName
>>
>> [[[
>> _:a foaf:name "Alber Einstein" .
>> ]]]
>> s/Alber Einstein/Albert Einstein (2 occurrences)
>>
>> [[[
>> taxo:   http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/
>> ]]]
>> This prefix is not used anywhere in the document.
>>
>> I hope to have more comments in the future as I digest more of the
>> draft, but this is it for today...
>>
>> Steph.
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Received on Saturday, 10 July 2010 23:52:10 UTC