- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:44:04 +0200
- To: Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 07:43:43 UTC
Shane, Manu, it is not a formal obligation at this point but I think it would be a good idea to consider the open public comments on Core[1] and at least handle them with an answer sent before we publish (note necessarily wait for their replies). A far as I could see most of them are editorial comments and may be even moot by now. Exceptions: - GK-3 refers to issue of differentiating between 1.0 and 1.1, something that we did discuss and decided, but I am not sure what the right answer to Gregg should be - I am not sure how to answer to DS-1. I am not sure I understand him or I agree with him; CURIE-s, for me, are syntactic tricks and he seems to put too much into it. But, in any case, a proper answer should be sent to him... Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Comments ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 07:43:43 UTC