- From: RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:22:13 +0000
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/36 Raised by: Manu Sporny On product: RDFa 1.1 Core Markus proposed that Profile documents should allow the creation of a default vocabulary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0041.html This has a number of implications: 1. How does one declare a default vocabulary via the profile document? 2. How does the declaration affect the @vocab attribute, would it override it and if so, in what order? 3. How does the declaration affect the CURIEs like ":next"? The biggest question is the value of this feature? What is the use case that we are attempting to support? Does this overly-complicate RDFa without much payback?
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 12:22:15 UTC