OT: RDFa not good enough for halibut, coca-cola, guitars and rhinos
Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104
HTML5/RDFa discussion
ISSUE-127: CR Comment: [Noah Mendelsohn] Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing
ISSUE-126: CR Comment: conformance for markup, a processor, or both?
meeting record: 2008-08-28 RDFa telecon
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 28 August 2008, 1500 UTC
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 21 August 2008, 1500 UTC
[Fwd: Transition Request: RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing]
Ubiquity
DRAFT Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing
RDFa Problem Statement
HTML5/RDFa
[OT] Using RDFa For License Meta-Data [WAS Re: FYI]
Re: RDFa in HTML 4
FYI
Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing
meeting record: 2008-08-21 RDFa Task Force telecon
Mozilla Labs Aurora mock-up depends on RDFa/uF-like technology
clearly not awake
RDFa Best Practices (on wiki)
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 21 August 2008, 1500 UTC
RDFa Syntax transition to PR
RDFa Question, Clarification
RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft
- Re: RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft
- Re: RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft
RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review
- Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review
- Possibly adding amaya: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review
- Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review
Full URIs in @rel -- use-case?
RDFa JavaScript Library
Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080612
meeting record: 2008-08-14 RDFa telecon
Empty plain literal test
Telecon Agenda - August 14th, 2008, 1500 UTC
ISSUE-125: CR Comment: comment on section 2.1 @name
new Primer Draft
XHTML Access Draft updated
CR-rdfa-syntax comment on section 2.1 @name
Re: ISSUE-122: CR Comment: Comments on Syntax from Alan Ruttenberg
Test case #31
GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109
- RE: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109
- Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109
- Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109
- Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109
meeting record: 2008-08-07 RDFa informal telecon
telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update
- RE: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update
- Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update
- Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update
- Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update