- From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:43:59 +0200
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hausenblas, Michael a écrit : > + the XSLT-based impl from Fabien [3] is missing (this one can't be done > using our Test Harness) > > [3] http://ns.inria.fr/grddl/rdfa/2008/07/21/RDFa2RDFXML.xsl > Three elements of answer: (1) may be it could be tested through transformr which is using this latest version of the transformation e.g. for test 0001: http://transformr.co.uk/rdfa/http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0001.xhtml the pattern being http://transformr.co.uk/rdfa/<URI> (2) according to my JUnit results this 19th version passes all accepted tests except: - tests with XML literal, xmlns declaration and white spaces to preserve: 92, 94, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 108, 112 for these tests however the manual comparison shows the text is properly preserved - test 109 : I fail, I could start adding tests to check those cases but I am not sure how far I should go and I wonder if validating the XHTML is not outside the scope of an XSLT transformation for RDFa. Does that test mean I should always ignore the “@xml:base” for RDFa? (3) as mentioned before I believe tests 52 and 53 should have the following property in the manifest <expectedResults rdf:datatype="xsd:boolean">false</expectedResults> Cheers, -- Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 13:44:39 UTC