RE: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review

Steven,

Thanks a lot for your comments! I think all your comments are perfectly
valid and will be integrated as soon as I have the feedback from the Ed
and Diego as well.

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steven Pemberton [mailto:steven.pemberton@cwi.nl] 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:13 PM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael; Dan Brickley
>Cc: RDFa; Ivan Herman
>Subject: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review
>
>> Thoughts, others?
>
>Excellent work!
>
>On colour blindness, as far as I recall, the guideline says 
>not to use  
>colour as the only source of information. Since all cells that 
>are coded  
>red/green also contain the words pass/fail, I think we are in 
>the clear.  
>Regardless, I still prefer the red/green colouring :-)
>
>A few editorial comments:
>
>STATUS
>	- s/HTML working Group/XHTML2 Working Group/
>	and the correct link is http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/
>
>INTRODUCTON
>	- The title of the RDFa spec is "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax 
>and Processing"  
>and not "RDFa Syntax and Processing rules"; maybe that wasn't the  
>intention, but it looks like that is what it is being called. 
>This ought  
>to be corrected in a couple of places.
>	- I think it is worth mentioning the exit criterion "At 
>least two  
>implementations have been demonstrated that pass all tests in 
>the test  
>suite." in the introduction.
>	- in: However, the report does not attempt to test the 
>conformance of the  
>implementations.
>	    s/However/Consequently/
>	- s/freezed/frozen/
>
>So how about this for a replacement paragraph:
>
>The goal of this report is to verify that <em>RDFa in XHTML: 
>Syntax and  
>Processing</em> [RDFa Syntax] is implementable; consequently, 
>the report  
>should not be seen as a conformance test of the 
>implementations. The exit  
>criteria for the specification require that "At least two 
>implementations  
>have been demonstrated that pass all tests in the test suite." 
>Following  
>the decision from 2008-07-31 by the RDF in HTML Task Force 
>[RDFHTML-TF],  
>testing has been done using a frozen version of the [RDFa Test Cases].
>
>RDFA PROCESSORS
>	- s/server an take/server and take/
>RDFA TOOLS
>	- s/A couple of tools that produce and/or consume RDFa 
>is available,  
>already./A couple of tools that produce and/or consume RDFa 
>are available  
>already./
>
>Best wishes,
>
>Steven
>
>> Cheers,
>> 	Michael
>>
>> [1]
>> 
>http://colorfilter.wickline.org/?a=1;r=;l=0;j=1;u=www.w3.org/20
06/07/SWD
>> /RDFa/implementation-report;t=p
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>> http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@danbri.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:28 PM
>>> To: Ivan Herman
>>> Cc: Hausenblas, Michael; RDFa
>>> Subject: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review
>>>
>>> Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>> A tiny comment, purely on style: in other implementation 
>report I saw
>>>> colour coding for the table entries. Typically 'pass' would
>>> have a green
>>>> background, fail would have a red one. I guess with some
>>> editor it would
>>>> not be difficult to add this. It certainly makes it easier
>>> for the eye
>>>> to spot problems...
>>>
>>> Even tinyer comment: it would be good to know the most accessible
>>> styling for such things, thinking about red-green
>>> colourblindness etc. I
>>> just found this tool, http://colorfilter.wickline.org/ but not
>>> sure how
>>> good it is.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://danbri.org/
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 07:22:26 UTC