- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:26:30 +0200
- To: "Elias Torres" <elias@torrez.us>, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Elias, Ben, Thanks a lot! Will be integrated in the RDFa IR *very* soon :) Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of >Elias Torres >Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:14 PM >To: Ben Adida >Cc: RDFa >Subject: Re: RDFa JavaScript Library > >Similarly, I'm 84/98. Attached is my earl report, if it's still time >and it helps the IR. > >-Elias > >On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> So I fixed a couple of edge-case bugs in my RDFa JavaScript library >> (good test cases!), and am now passing 85/98. The 13 failed >test cases >> break down as follows: >> >> >> TC 11: likely SPARQL bug (UNION) >> >> TC 42: likely test harness bug (negative result) >> >> TC 86: likely test harness bug (negative result) >> >> TC 92: likely SPARQL bug (UNION) >> >> TC 94: likely SPARQL bug (UNION) >> >> TC 99: likely SPARQL bug (\n vs. actual newline) >> >> TC 100: same canonical XML, it actually works. >> >> TC 101: same canonical XML, it actually works. >> >> TC 102: same canonical XML, it actually works. >> >> TC 103: same canonical XML, it actually works. >> >> TC 107: test harness bug (negative result) >> >> TC 108: likely SPARQL bug (white space) >> >> TC 112: likely SPARQL bug (white space) >> >> >> In other words, as far as I can tell, the parser is doing the right >> thing in all test cases. However, I'm not super concerned >about getting >> an "official" score that's higher than 85/98, I just wanted >to be sure >> there was no core problem and the test harness wasn't giving >me a higher >> score than I deserved :) >> >> I've frozen the library: >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/ >> >> You can re-create the EARL report here: >> http://torrez.us/code/rdfa-js/tests/ >> >> by using the following RDFa test runner: >> >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/rdfa-testrunner.js >> >> The parser itself is at: >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/rdfa.js >> >> >> And of course I'm attaching the EARL report if you don't >want to do it >> yourself. It's worth noting that this applies in *Firefox >only* for now. >> Other browsers should be close behind, but I'll test them >another time. >> >> -Ben >> >> >
Received on Monday, 18 August 2008 15:32:59 UTC