public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from August 2008 by date

Sunday, 31 August 2008

• OT: RDFa not good enough for halibut, coca-cola, guitars and rhinos Manu Sporny
• Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104 Jonathan Rees

Saturday, 30 August 2008

• Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104 Shane McCarron
• Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104 Jonathan Rees
• Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104 Shane McCarron
• Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104 Jonathan Rees
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 29 August 2008

• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: HTML5/RDFa discussion Ben Adida
• HTML5/RDFa discussion Manu Sporny

Thursday, 28 August 2008

• Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing Ralph R. Swick
• ISSUE-127: CR Comment: [Noah Mendelsohn] Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-126: CR Comment: conformance for markup, a processor, or both? SWD Issue Tracker
• meeting record: 2008-08-28 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 28 August 2008, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 21 August 2008, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: Ubiquity Martin McEvoy
• Re: Ubiquity Toby A Inkster
• [Fwd: Transition Request: RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing] Guus Schreiber

Wednesday, 27 August 2008

• Re: Ubiquity Martin McEvoy
• Re: Ubiquity Dan Brickley
• Ubiquity Ben Adida
• DRAFT Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing Ralph R. Swick

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

• Re: RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft Ed Summers
• RDFa Problem Statement Manu Sporny

Monday, 25 August 2008

• HTML5/RDFa Manu Sporny

Sunday, 24 August 2008

• Re: MarkLogic RDFa now "pasing" all test cases Ben Adida
• Re: MarkLogic RDFa now "pasing" all test cases Ivan Herman

Saturday, 23 August 2008

• [OT] Using RDFa For License Meta-Data [WAS Re: FYI] Robert Burrell Donkin

Sunday, 24 August 2008

• Re: MarkLogic RDFa now "pasing" all test cases Manu Sporny
• MarkLogic RDFa now "pasing" all test cases Micah Dubinko

Friday, 22 August 2008

• Re: RDFa in HTML 4 Toby A Inkster

Thursday, 21 August 2008

• FYI Ben Adida
• Comments on RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and processing noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• meeting record: 2008-08-21 RDFa Task Force telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Mozilla Labs Aurora mock-up depends on RDFa/uF-like technology Manu Sporny
• Re: clearly not awake Shane McCarron
• Re: clearly not awake Ben Adida
• Re: clearly not awake Mark Birbeck
• Re: clearly not awake Ben Adida
• Re: clearly not awake Mark Birbeck
• clearly not awake Ben Adida
• RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 21 August 2008, 1500 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: CR-rdfa-syntax comment on section 2.1 @name KANZAKI Masahide
• RDFa Best Practices (on wiki) Manu Sporny
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 21 August 2008, 1500 UTC Ben Adida

Wednesday, 20 August 2008

• Re: RDFa Question, Clarification Micah Dubinko
• RDFa Syntax transition to PR Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Question, Clarification Toby A Inkster
• Re: RDFa Question, Clarification Martin McEvoy
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft Diego Berrueta
• RE: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

• Re: RDFa Question, Clarification Toby A Inkster
• RDFa Question, Clarification Martin McEvoy
• RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Steven Pemberton
• RE: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Possibly adding amaya: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Ivan Herman
• RE: Possibly adding amaya: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Dan Brickley
• Re: Possibly adding amaya: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Ivan Herman
• RE: Possibly adding amaya: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael
• Possibly adding amaya: Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Ivan Herman
• RDFa Implementation Report - ready for review Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 18 August 2008

• Full URIs in @rel -- use-case? Norman Gray
• RE: RDFa JavaScript Library Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa JavaScript Library Elias Torres

Sunday, 17 August 2008

• RDFa JavaScript Library Ben Adida

Thursday, 14 August 2008

• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080612 Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Empty plain literal test Ben Adida
• Re: Empty plain literal test Shane McCarron
• meeting record: 2008-08-14 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Empty plain literal test Manu Sporny
• Re: CR-rdfa-syntax comment on section 2.1 @name Shane McCarron
• Re: new Primer Draft Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Test case #31 Ralph R. Swick
• Re: ISSUE-122: CR Comment: Comments on Syntax from Alan Ruttenberg Ralph R. Swick
• Re: ISSUE-125: CR Comment: comment on section 2.1 @name Ralph R. Swick
• Telecon Agenda - August 14th, 2008, 1500 UTC Ben Adida
• ISSUE-125: CR Comment: comment on section 2.1 @name SWD Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

• RE: new Primer Draft Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: new Primer Draft Ben Adida
• RE: new Primer Draft Hausenblas, Michael
• new Primer Draft Ben Adida
• Re: XHTML Access Draft updated Shane McCarron
• XHTML Access Draft updated Shane McCarron

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-122: CR Comment: Comments on Syntax from Alan Ruttenberg Shane McCarron
• Re: CR-rdfa-syntax comment on section 2.1 @name Shane McCarron
• CR-rdfa-syntax comment on section 2.1 @name KANZAKI Masahide

Monday, 11 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-122: CR Comment: Comments on Syntax from Alan Ruttenberg Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-122: CR Comment: Comments on Syntax from Alan Ruttenberg Ben Adida

Sunday, 10 August 2008

• Re: Late, but I have reservations. Gannon Dick

Friday, 8 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-122: CR Comment: Comments on Syntax from Alan Ruttenberg Ralph R. Swick
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Martin McEvoy
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Martin McEvoy
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Martin McEvoy
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Fabien Gandon
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Martin McEvoy
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Martin McEvoy
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Fabien Gandon
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Martin McEvoy
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Fabien Gandon
• Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Toby A Inkster
• RE: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Test case #31 Toby A Inkster
• Re: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Fabien Gandon
• RE: GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: Test case #31 Hausenblas, Michael

Thursday, 7 August 2008

• Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Toby A Inkster
• Re: Test cases #32, #104, #1001 Toby A Inkster
• Test case #31 Toby A Inkster
• GRDDL profile and transform for RDFa: version 20 fixing problems with TC52, TC53 and TC109 Fabien Gandon
• meeting record: 2008-08-07 RDFa informal telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: RDFa XSLT [was: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update] Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa XSLT [was: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update] Ralph R. Swick
• Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Fabien Gandon
• RE: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Mark Birbeck
• Re: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Ben Adida
• RE: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Jeremy Carroll
• telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update Hausenblas, Michael

Tuesday, 5 August 2008

• Re: Late, but I have reservations. Ben Adida
• ISSUE-124: CR Comment: reservations about use of RDFa attributes in head SWD Issue Tracker

Monday, 4 August 2008

• Yet another implementation Micah Dubinko
• Re: Help with test case 105 and 106 Micah Dubinko
• Re: Help with test case 105 and 106 Ben Adida
• Re: Help with test case 105 and 106 Micah Dubinko
• Re: Help with test case 105 and 106 Ben Adida
• Help with test case 105 and 106 Micah Dubinko

Friday, 1 August 2008

• AW: ISSUE-121: CR Comment: clarification of default namespace Florian Schmedding
• RE: RDFa test suite addition Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Late, but I have reservations. Gannon Dick

Last message date: Sunday, 31 August 2008 20:14:16 UTC