- From: Diego Berrueta <diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:02:00 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Ben, It has been an easy review. I agree with all the changes introduced in the Syntax. Anyway, I would like to raise your attention to a number of broken links to the DTD modules. I assume that they will be fixed before the next transition. I've also reviewed the resolutions of the CR issues, and they look fine. Btw, although I have not reviewed the Primer, let me say that I fully support the s/HTML/XHTML/ change. Cheers, Diego. Ben Adida wrote: > Ed, Diego, (and SWD WG), > > The RDFa work is ready for working-group review, and the review should > be fairly easy: we've only made minor editorial changes. > > RDFa Syntax Editors' Draft: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080814/ > > Diff from CR version: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080814/rdfa-syntax-diff.html > > RDFa Implementation Report > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/ > > Issues Addressed for CR: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/121 > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/122 > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/124 > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/125 > > We don't have final responses from all commenters, yet, but we will keep > the WG updated of course, and we won't schedule the transition call > until we're ready. > > > And if you're interested, although it's not required reading at this > stage, we also have a new version of the Primer, with two notable > changes: we now say "XHTML" instead of "HTML" and explain why, and we > link to a complete example page of markup: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080813/ > > -Ben >
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 08:03:44 UTC