Re: RDFa JavaScript Library

Similarly, I'm 84/98. Attached is my earl report, if it's still time
and it helps the IR.

-Elias

On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> So I fixed a couple of edge-case bugs in my RDFa JavaScript library
> (good test cases!), and am now passing 85/98. The 13 failed test cases
> break down as follows:
>
>
> TC 11: likely SPARQL bug (UNION)
>
> TC 42: likely test harness bug (negative result)
>
> TC 86: likely test harness bug (negative result)
>
> TC 92: likely SPARQL bug (UNION)
>
> TC 94: likely SPARQL bug (UNION)
>
> TC 99: likely SPARQL bug (\n vs. actual newline)
>
> TC 100: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>
> TC 101: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>
> TC 102: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>
> TC 103: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>
> TC 107: test harness bug (negative result)
>
> TC 108: likely SPARQL bug (white space)
>
> TC 112: likely SPARQL bug (white space)
>
>
> In other words, as far as I can tell, the parser is doing the right
> thing in all test cases. However, I'm not super concerned about getting
> an "official" score that's higher than 85/98, I just wanted to be sure
> there was no core problem and the test harness wasn't giving me a higher
> score than I deserved :)
>
> I've frozen the library:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/
>
> You can re-create the EARL report here:
> http://torrez.us/code/rdfa-js/tests/
>
> by using the following RDFa test runner:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/rdfa-testrunner.js
>
> The parser itself is at:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/rdfa.js
>
>
> And of course I'm attaching the EARL report if you don't want to do it
> yourself. It's worth noting that this applies in *Firefox only* for now.
> Other browsers should be close behind, but I'll test them another time.
>
> -Ben
>
>