- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:58:10 -0500
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- CC: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
And yes - you should ignore @xml:base ALWAYS in XHTML+RDFa. Ralph R. Swick wrote: > At 03:43 PM 8/7/2008 +0200, Fabien Gandon wrote: > >> - test 109 : I fail, I could start adding tests to check those cases but I am not sure how far I should go and I wonder if validating the XHTML is not outside the scope of an XSLT transformation for RDFa. Does that test mean I should always ignore the “@xml:base” for RDFa? >> > > The point of test 109 is not to discover whether an implementation > notices that the document does not validate against the DTD/XHTML > schema but rather to confirm that @xml:base is ignored (and thus > the subject of the triple in the test is the document and not the > value of the @xml:base attribute) in an XHTML1 document if the > XHTML RDFa processor proceeds in spite of the validation failure. > > Validating is outside the scope of these tests. The comment in > the test case is to note that we are aware that this test intentionally > does not validate. > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:58:57 UTC