public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from February 2007 by date

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27) Thomas Baker
• Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27) Ivan Herman
• Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer Antoine Isaac
• Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer Guus Schreiber
• [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] FOAF this! Ben Adida
• [RDFa] FOAF this! Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 26 February 2007

• RE: action progress: test suite hosting Hausenblas, Michael
• action progress: test suite hosting Ralph R. Swick
• Re: telecon regrets for me Simone Onofri
• RDFa Test Suite review (was: RE: telecon regrets for me) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: telecon regrets for me Mark Birbeck
• telecon regrets for me Ben Adida

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• semantics of @role a.k.a. xh:role [was: Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Al Gilman

Wednesday, 21 February 2007

• [RDFa] RDFa in XHTML 1 Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Simone Onofri
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Mark Birbeck
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! olivier Thereaux

Tuesday, 20 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] Test Suite progress Dan Connolly
• RE: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Simone Onofri
• RE: [RDFa] Test Suite progress Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Dan Connolly
• Re: [RDFa] Test Suite progress Dan Connolly
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Dan Connolly
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Guus Schreiber
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Ben Adida
• [RDFa] Test Suite progress Hausenblas, Michael
• [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! Hausenblas, Michael

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• RE: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) Ivan Herman

Friday, 16 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) Mark Birbeck
• RE: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) Ivan Herman
• [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) Hausenblas, Michael

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Karl Dubost
• Re: RDFa in 10sec Steven Pemberton
• Collection of explanations at ESW Wiki (was: RE: RDFa in 10sec) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Steven Pemberton
• RE: Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: RDFa in 10sec Ivan Herman
• RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Mike Schinkel
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Karl Dubost
• RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Mike Schinkel
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Karl Dubost
• Re: RDFa in 10sec Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Simone Onofri
• Re: Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) Laurian Gridinoc
• Re: Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) Bob DuCharme
• Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) Elias Torres
• RDFa in 10sec Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Al Gilman
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Simone Onofri
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ivan Herman
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Simone Onofri
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Elias Torres
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Steven Pemberton
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Elias Torres
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Steven Pemberton
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Steven Pemberton
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ivan Herman
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ivan Herman
• RE: [RDFa] Overview Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Steven Pemberton
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• [RDFa] new telecon code starting 26 Feb Ralph R. Swick
• RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: RDFa Schedule Hausenblas, Michael
• [RDFa] The CLASS attribute Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Anne van Kesteren
• RDFa Schedule Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Mark Birbeck
• Re: [RDFa] Overview Ben Adida
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Mark Birbeck
• Re: [RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question) Mark Birbeck
• Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content Ivan Herman
• [RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question) Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Shane McCarron
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Karl Dubost
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Ben Adida
• [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation Karl Dubost
• Call for Submissions: ICIMP 2007 & ICDT 2007 & ICGD&BC 2007, Silicon Valley, July 1-6, 2007 Dr. Reda
• Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question Karl Dubost
• Re: [RDFa] Some QA-related issues regarding RDFa documents Karl Dubost

Monday, 12 February 2007

• [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-02-12 RDF-in-XHTML telecon Steven Pemberton
• RE: meta/@name vs. meta/@description Hausenblas, Michael
• meta/@name vs. meta/@description Bob DuCharme

Sunday, 11 February 2007

• Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC (0900 Boston time) Ben Adida

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution Ben Adida
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution Wing C Yung
• [RDFa] Generating RDFa from Movable Type II Hausenblas, Michael

Friday, 9 February 2007

• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution Ben Adida
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution Bob DuCharme
• RE: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question boland@nist.gov
• Re: typo and suggested rewording in "RDF/A Syntax" document Mark Birbeck
• [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: question on RDFa subject resolution Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution Ben Adida
• question on RDFa subject resolution Bob DuCharme

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• typo and suggested rewording in "RDF/A Syntax" document Bob DuCharme
• [RDFa] Terminology Proposal Hausenblas, Michael
• [RDFa] Some QA-related issues regarding RDFa documents Hausenblas, Michael

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• RE: [RDFa] Test Suite: First Try ... Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection Mike Linksvayer
• Re: [RDFa] Test Suite: First Try ... Dan Connolly
• RE: FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection Mike Linksvayer
• [RDFa] Test Suite: First Try ... Hausenblas, Michael
• FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection Hausenblas, Michael

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• [RDFa] Relationship between RDFa and GRDDL Ben Adida
• [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-02-5 RDF-in-XHTML telecon Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 5 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Ivan Herman
• Re: [FYI] Machine Tags Steven Pemberton
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Mark Birbeck
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Steven Pemberton
• [RDFa] Test Cases (was: RE: Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC (0900 Boston time)) Hausenblas, Michael
• [FYI] Machine Tags Karl Dubost
• Time of calls March 12-25 Steven Pemberton
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Ivan Herman
• RE: [RDFa] Testcases Hausenblas, Michael

Friday, 2 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] Testcases Karl Dubost
• Re: Commenst on use cases #2 - #7 [Re: an update of the use case document] Karl Dubost
• Re: Comment on Use Case #1: [Re: an update of the use case document] Karl Dubost

Monday, 5 February 2007

• my actions Ben Adida
• Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC (0900 Boston time) Ben Adida

Sunday, 4 February 2007

• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Mark Birbeck

Friday, 2 February 2007

• RE: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Ben Adida
• [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string Wing C Yung

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 13:40:19 UTC