- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:11:26 +0900
- To: ben@adida.net
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hello Ben, You wrote: > There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he > says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right > until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator. Somebody pointed me to this thread and I am curious to learn more about this. I think indeed, the ability to validate XHTML with RDFa content will be a good push for its adoption, but I am not sure I understand what you mean by "an XHTML 1.1 module validator". Do you mean that you are working on an RDFa module using XHTML 1.1 Modularization techniques, and/or a profile for XHTML+RDFa (or indeed XHTML+XForms+SVG+MathML +RDFa, as done in e.g. [1])? Or that there is a tool in the works for it? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/ Apologies if this is a FAQ, if so, a pointer would be appreciated. Thank you, olivier. -- olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/ W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 03:11:38 UTC