- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:22:37 +0100
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, www-html-editor@w3.org
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:57:10 +0100, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: > Which brings up an important topic: validation. It would be good if we > started a discussion on how it might be possible to extend HTML with > extra attributes (and possibly elements, although we can start with > attributes for now). This discussion must involve the validation team, > since the biggest issue for RDFa is that: it breaks nothing in existing > browsers, but it breaks the validator. How do we bridge that gap? How do > we allow for valid HTML extensions without having to push out a new HTML > recommendation? The thing is that you also want to add xmlns="" stuff to HTML as I understand it. This isn't really feasible imo for the text/html serialization. (As it would only have affect to the RDFa stuff and not to the rest of the document.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:23:17 UTC