W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2007

RE: [RDFa] Test Suite progress

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:52:34 +0100
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520854D7@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-qa@w3.org>, <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

> I see lots of focus on test metadata and test infrastructure,
> which is great, but unless I'm missing something, there aren't any
> actual tests that are complete yet, right?
Kind of. As this was an _intermediate_ report, these are
_intermediate_ results, etc.
I just wanted to flag the progress and express that it looks
doable to meet the 26 Feb 2007 deadline, right?
> I suggest a shift in priority toward getting one or two test
> cases finished before doing more work on infrastructure.
> The first few examples from the primer seem like an important
> thing to test.
I tend to disagree. As of [1] we agreed to develop the test cases
in a integral way. So, for each section in the RDFa Syntax doc [2]
there will be a single test assertions realised through a so called 
Conformance Query (SPARQL ASK query) that, when executed on the
resulting RDF graph, the answer MUST yield 'YES'.
Please Note: Not Primer but Syntax is the base, and _for each_ section
or 'production rule case' there will be a single test assertion; cf. also [3]
Dan, was this too confusing now, or did it 'help'?
Karl, any thoughts?
[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-htmltf-minutes.html#item03
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/
[3] http://code.wingerz.com/rdfatests/coverage.txt
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:49 UTC