Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content

Looking at the RDFa issues' list I realized that an issue I raised a
long time on the identification of RDFa content[2] is not on the list.
As far as I can see, this thread ended with a mail of Mark[3] but I do
not think it should be considered as closed...

The same holds for the datatype of literals. Wing has re-started the
thread in [4], we had some discussion in the resulting thread, but it
isn't recorded on [1] either...

Thanks

Ivan

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/2
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Oct/0067
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Dec/0022
[4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0000.html


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf