- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:25:38 -0600
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, www-html-editor@w3.org, Olivier Théreaux <ot@w3.org>
The HTML Working Group (still meeting every week, not sure what you mean about if/when we restart) already has such a profile in development. Watch this space. Karl Dubost wrote: > > Adding olivier Théreaux, > > Le 13 févr. 2007 à 22:57, Ben Adida a écrit : >> Which brings up an important topic: validation. It would be good if we >> started a discussion on how it might be possible to extend HTML with >> extra attributes (and possibly elements, although we can start with >> attributes for now). This discussion must involve the validation team, >> since the biggest issue for RDFa is that: it breaks nothing in existing >> browsers, but it breaks the validator. How do we bridge that gap? How do >> we allow for valid HTML extensions without having to push out a new HTML >> recommendation? >> >> RDFa is, for the most part, a simple proposal. The process of getting it >> to validate is far too complicated by comparison. > > May we (olivier and I) could publish a W3C Team Note with a > XHTML + RDFa profile > ala An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile [1] > Or maybe this Task Force could do it, though I'm not sure the previous > HTML WG would agree or the HTML CG. > > I do not say that it is the right solution, I'm just exploring ideas > for now. :) > Olivier might jump in the discussion to say what he thinks. > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/ > > > > --Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ > W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead > QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:27:15 UTC