- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:17:51 -0500
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > > Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1] > raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only > :( This isn't surprising, people think extra attributes means XHTML2 only. There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator. > I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers > that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already. A very good point, but I would suggest holding off a bit until we have the next version of the Primer and at least an updated (if not published) version of the syntax. So, mid-March or so. -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 14:18:01 UTC