W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:17:51 -0500
Message-ID: <45DB030F.4070705@adida.net>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1] 
> raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only
> :(

This isn't surprising, people think extra attributes means XHTML2 only.
There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he
says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right
until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator.

> I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers
> that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already.

A very good point, but I would suggest holding off a bit until we have
the next version of the Primer and at least an updated (if not
published) version of the syntax. So, mid-March or so.

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 14:18:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:49 UTC