Yes, we discussed that in Cambridge and it is a very good point. I know. I just feel that the price we pay might be higher than necessary. (I must admit that differentiating the use of the class attribute on whether it is namespaced or not goes against my instict, somehow...). To be honest: I do not think that *this* would be the crucial point in getting the MF people closer to us. Seeing the various reactions on mailing lists, the usage of namespaces leads to much more pushback by people who regard namespaces as Evil on Earth... But that is another discussion issue... Ivan Ben Adida wrote: > Ivan Herman wrote: > >>+1 >> >>Steven Pemberton wrote: >> >>>I want to reraise my position: leave class alone, and use something new >>>for what we want. I still have the feeling that @role can do the job. > > > There is a *huge* lost opportunity if we do this, which is that we don't > show a natural progression from microformats to RDFa. Microformats > already use the CLASS attribute for this kind of thing, and it's a well > accepted practice. New attributes should be used sparingly. > > -Ben -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 13:50:10 UTC