public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from February 2007 by author

Al Gilman

• semantics of @role a.k.a. xh:role [was: Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer (Tuesday, 27 February)

Ben Adida

• [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [RDFa] FOAF this! (Tuesday, 27 February)
• telecon regrets for me (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RDFa Schedule (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Overview (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC (0900 Boston time) (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution (Friday, 9 February)
• [RDFa] Relationship between RDFa and GRDDL (Tuesday, 6 February)
• my actions (Monday, 5 February)
• Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC (0900 Boston time) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Friday, 2 February)

Bob DuCharme

• Re: Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• meta/@name vs. meta/@description (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution (Friday, 9 February)
• question on RDFa subject resolution (Friday, 9 February)
• typo and suggested rewording in "RDF/A Syntax" document (Thursday, 8 February)

boland@nist.gov

• Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question (Friday, 9 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: [RDFa] Test Suite progress (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Test Suite progress (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Test Suite: First Try ... (Wednesday, 7 February)

Dr. Reda

• Call for Submissions: ICIMP 2007 & ICDT 2007 & ICGD&BC 2007, Silicon Valley, July 1-6, 2007 (Tuesday, 13 February)

Elias Torres

• Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Wednesday, 14 February)

Guus Schreiber

• Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)

Hausenblas, Michael

• [RDFa] FOAF this! (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: action progress: test suite hosting (Monday, 26 February)
• RDFa Test Suite review (was: RE: telecon regrets for me) (Monday, 26 February)
• [RDFa] RDFa in XHTML 1 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: [RDFa] Test Suite progress (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [RDFa] Test Suite progress (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) (Saturday, 17 February)
• RE: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) (Friday, 16 February)
• [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) (Friday, 16 February)
• Collection of explanations at ESW Wiki (was: RE: RDFa in 10sec) (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) (Thursday, 15 February)
• RDFa in 10sec (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: [RDFa] Overview (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: RDFa Schedule (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: meta/@name vs. meta/@description (Monday, 12 February)
• [RDFa] Generating RDFa from Movable Type II (Saturday, 10 February)
• RE: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question (Friday, 9 February)
• [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: question on RDFa subject resolution (Friday, 9 February)
• [RDFa] Terminology Proposal (Thursday, 8 February)
• [RDFa] Some QA-related issues regarding RDFa documents (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: [RDFa] Test Suite: First Try ... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [RDFa] Test Suite: First Try ... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-02-5 RDF-in-XHTML telecon (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [RDFa] Test Cases (was: RE: Telecon Monday, 1400 UTC (0900 Boston time)) (Monday, 5 February)
• RE: [RDFa] Testcases (Monday, 5 February)
• RE: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Friday, 2 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa in 10sec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Monday, 5 February)

Karl Dubost

• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: RDFa in 10sec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Some QA-related issues regarding RDFa documents (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [FYI] Machine Tags (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Testcases (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Commenst on use cases #2 - #7 [Re: an update of the use case document] (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Comment on Use Case #1: [Re: an update of the use case document] (Friday, 2 February)

Laurian Gridinoc

• Re: Bob DuCharme on RDFa (was: Re: RDFa in 10sec) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: telecon regrets for me (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: typo and suggested rewording in "RDF/A Syntax" document (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Sunday, 4 February)

Mike Linksvayer

• RE: FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: FW: Interesting: Part 4: The User Interface of Microformat Detection (Wednesday, 7 February)

Mike Schinkel

• RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 15 February)

olivier Thereaux

• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Wednesday, 21 February)

Ralph R. Swick

• action progress: test suite hosting (Monday, 26 February)
• [RDFa] new telecon code starting 26 Feb (Tuesday, 13 February)

Shane McCarron

• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Tuesday, 13 February)

Simone Onofri

• Re: telecon regrets for me (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO! (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: RDFa in 10sec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] issues meta/link outside of head and browsers implementation (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-02-12 RDF-in-XHTML telecon (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [FYI] Machine Tags (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Monday, 5 February)
• Time of calls March 12-25 (Monday, 5 February)

Thomas Baker

• Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Wing C Yung

• Re: question on RDFa subject resolution (Saturday, 10 February)
• [RDFa] Default datatype should be a string (Friday, 2 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 13:40:19 UTC