- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:37:17 +0100
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Ben Adida wrote: > Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1] >> raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only >> :( Yes, I still hear this as well (I include a slide about RDFa in each presentation I give). > > This isn't surprising, people think extra attributes means XHTML2 only. > There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he > says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right > until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator. > >> I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers >> that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already. > > A very good point, but I would suggest holding off a bit until we have > the next version of the Primer and at least an updated (if not > published) version of the syntax. So, mid-March or so. OK, but by mid March we should really start a publicity campaign. Guus > > -Ben > -- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 14:37:58 UTC