- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:16:46 +0900
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, www-html-editor@w3.org, Olivier Théreaux <ot@w3.org>
Adding olivier Théreaux,
Le 13 févr. 2007 à 22:57, Ben Adida a écrit :
> Which brings up an important topic: validation. It would be good if we
> started a discussion on how it might be possible to extend HTML with
> extra attributes (and possibly elements, although we can start with
> attributes for now). This discussion must involve the validation team,
> since the biggest issue for RDFa is that: it breaks nothing in
> existing
> browsers, but it breaks the validator. How do we bridge that gap?
> How do
> we allow for valid HTML extensions without having to push out a new
> HTML
> recommendation?
>
> RDFa is, for the most part, a simple proposal. The process of
> getting it
> to validate is far too complicated by comparison.
May we (olivier and I) could publish a W3C Team Note with a
XHTML + RDFa profile
ala An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile [1]
Or maybe this Task Force could do it, though I'm not sure the
previous HTML WG would agree or the HTML CG.
I do not say that it is the right solution, I'm just exploring ideas
for now. :)
Olivier might jump in the discussion to say what he thinks.
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:17:12 UTC