public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from December 2007 by date

Sunday, 30 December 2007

pyRdfa updated Ivan Herman

Friday, 28 December 2007

Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 26 December 2007

Re: Intro to semantic web (video) Ben Adida
RDFa use in US gov? Ben Adida

Tuesday, 25 December 2007

Intro to semantic web (video) Manu Sporny

Monday, 24 December 2007

Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman

Sunday, 23 December 2007

Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Mark Birbeck
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman

Saturday, 22 December 2007

Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman

Friday, 21 December 2007

Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman

Thursday, 20 December 2007

meeting record: 2007-12-20 RDF-in-XHTML [RDFa] telecon Ralph R. Swick
Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ivan Herman
Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Manu Sporny
Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Mark Birbeck
Re: Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing Mark Birbeck
Re: Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing Shane McCarron
Re: Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing Ivan Herman
Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing Mark Birbeck
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ivan Herman
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Ivan Herman
RE: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Ben Adida

Wednesday, 19 December 2007

Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
RE: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Hausenblas, Michael
Test cases to review for tomorrow Manu Sporny
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Ralph R. Swick
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Ivan Herman
RE: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Hausenblas, Michael
Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Ivan Herman
[PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa Hausenblas, Michael

Tuesday, 18 December 2007

[ESWiki] RDFa FAQ Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 17 December 2007

An editorial remarks (was Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics) Ivan Herman
Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Ivan Herman
Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Mark Birbeck
[RDFa TC] Update regarding TC 46-70 Hausenblas, Michael
Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Ivan Herman
Test Case #70: @resource with relative URL Manu Sporny
Test Case #69: @href with relative URL Manu Sporny
Test Case #68: @about with relative URL Manu Sporny
Test Case #67: property in HEAD with no @about, @resource, or @href Manu Sporny
Test Case #66: @instanceof in HEAD Manu Sporny
Test Case #53: @instanceof with @resource and nothing else, with a subelement Manu Sporny
Test Case #52: @instanceof with @resource and nothing else Manu Sporny
Test Case #48: @instanceof with @about and @rel present, @rel creates new bnode Manu Sporny
Test Case #47: @instanceof with @rel and @resource present, no @about Manu Sporny

Sunday, 16 December 2007

Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Mark Birbeck
Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Ivan Herman
CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics Ivan Herman

Saturday, 15 December 2007

Re: what are you saying? Sean B. Palmer
Test Case #57: hanging @rel can create multiple triples Manu Sporny

Thursday, 13 December 2007

Wednesday, 12 December 2007

Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax Ivan Herman
Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax Shane McCarron
Re: Test methodology (was Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax) Manu Sporny
Re: Test cases for call tomorrow (minor correction) Manu Sporny
Test cases for call tomorrow Manu Sporny
Test #51 (correction): @instanceof with a single @property Manu Sporny
Test methodology (was Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax) Ivan Herman
Test #64 (2nd correction): @about generates a proper triple when a safe CURIE is used Manu Sporny
Test #65: @rel properly connects triples generated using safe CURIEs Manu Sporny
Test #64 (corrected): @about generates a proper triple when a safe CURIE is used Manu Sporny
Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax Ivan Herman
Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax Shane McCarron
Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev Mark Birbeck
Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax Manu Sporny
Test #63: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and non-prefixed CURIE syntax Manu Sporny
Test #62: @rev in <head> using reserved XHTML value Manu Sporny
Test #61: @rel in <head> using reserved value Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

attribute content fully conserved in browsers, even in XML mode Ben Adida
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Mark Birbeck
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Shane McCarron
Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev Shane McCarron
Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev Ben Adida
Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev Shane McCarron
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Ben Adida
Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev Mark Birbeck
Reserved values for @rel and @rev Shane McCarron
Re: Test Case Needed: simplest form Manu Sporny
RE: Test Case Needed: simplest form Hausenblas, Michael
Test Case Needed: simplest form Shane McCarron
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Shane McCarron
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Ben Adida
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Ivan Herman
Test #60: UTF-8 conformance Manu Sporny
Test #59: @instanceof with @href, @rel, @resource, and no @about Manu Sporny
Test #52: @instanceof with @resource and nothing else (re-review needed?) Manu Sporny

Monday, 10 December 2007

Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Mark Birbeck
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Mark Birbeck
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Simone Onofri
Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Ivan Herman
@profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present Mark Birbeck
Re: CURIE section in syntax spec Mark Birbeck
Re: CURIE section in syntax spec Thomas Baker
Re: CURIE section in syntax spec Mark Birbeck
CURIE section in syntax spec Thomas Baker
Re: first pass implementation of Mark's chaining rules Ivan Herman

Friday, 7 December 2007

Test Case #59: multiple hanging @rels with multiple children Manu Sporny

Thursday, 6 December 2007

Re: Two new test cases needed? Mark Birbeck
Test Case #58: hanging @rel can create multiple triples, @instanceof permutation Manu Sporny
meeting record: 2007-12-06 RDFa Task Force Ralph R. Swick
Test Case #57: hanging @rel can create multiple triples Manu Sporny
Test Case #56: @instanceof applies to @about on same element with hanging rel Manu Sporny
RE: Two new test cases needed? Hausenblas, Michael
On hold test cases Manu Sporny
Two new test cases needed? Manu Sporny
RE: action on white-space preservation in attributes Hausenblas, Michael
RE: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
action on white-space preservation in attributes Ben Adida

Wednesday, 5 December 2007

telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
Re: first pass implementation of Mark's chaining rules Ben Adida
Re: first pass implementation of Mark's chaining rules Ivan Herman
Re: first pass implementation of Mark's chaining rules Simone Onofri
first pass implementation of Mark's chaining rules Ben Adida

Monday, 3 December 2007

Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Sean B. Palmer
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Shane McCarron
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Sean B. Palmer
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Sean B. Palmer
Warnings? (Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE) Ivan Herman
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Ivan Herman
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Benjamin Nowack
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Simone Onofri
Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE Karl Dubost
OWL in RDFa (was Re: Understanding 'chaining') Ivan Herman

Sunday, 2 December 2007

Re: Understanding 'chaining' Mark Birbeck
Re: Understanding 'chaining' Ben Adida
Re: Understanding 'chaining' Ivan Herman
Re: Understanding 'chaining' Ben Adida

Last message date: Sunday, 30 December 2007 12:03:29 UTC