- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:06:44 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <475FEAF4.2010107@w3.org>
You are right. But... would it be a huge ugliness if @rel (and similars) accepted a safe CURIE, too (not requiring it, just accepting it)? I expect this to be a recurrent source of mistakes... Just asking:-) Ivan Shane McCarron wrote: > > Actually, rel does not permit the use of a safe CURIE - only a CURIE. > So this should NOT produce a triple. > Manu Sporny wrote: >> Purpose: >> >> Tests to make sure that the @rel generates a triple in <head> when a >> reserved value is used from the XHTML namespace and the non-prefixed, >> safe CURIE syntax is used. >> >> ====================== Test Case 64 ============================= >> >> ---------------------Test Case 64 XHTML-------------------------- >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" >> "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd"> >> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> >> <head> >> <title>Test 0064</title> >> <link rel="[:next]" >> href="http://www.example.org/nextChapter.html" /> >> </head> >> <body> >> <p>This is the first chapter in a series of chapters.</p> >> </body> >> </html> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> ---------------------Test Case 64 SPARQL ----------------------- >> ASK WHERE { >> <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0064.xhtml> >> >> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#next> >> <http://www.example.org/nextChapter.html> . >> } >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> -- manu >> >> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 14:06:52 UTC