- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:01:41 -0600
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>
- CC: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, bnowack@semsol.com, dave@dajobe.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Sean B. Palmer wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 9:44 AM, Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I hope using xmlns and DTD can cover all questions about it. >> > > I don't see how this covers the only question, which, for the benefit > of those newly CC'd, is how to discover easily whether a document is > RDFa or not using only generic off-the-shelf XML tools like SAX > parsers and XSLT. > > Certainly an @profile value for RDFa would cover it, and I hope that > such a thing will be mandatory in the conformance section for XHTML + > RDFa. > I do not believe it will be mandatory, but... just out of curiosity, why doesn't the DTD cover all questions. Forgive my ignorance, but don't these "off the shelf" tools permit access to the DOCTYPE declaration? -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 16:02:38 UTC